Archibus by Eptura vs. Tririga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Archibus
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Archibus is an IWMS solution based on the IWMS capabilities of the former ARCHIBUS product line and the workspace planning and optimization solutions of the former Serraview, which merged with ARCHIBUS in December 2018.N/A
Tririga
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Tririga is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Pricing
Archibus by EpturaTririga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArchibusTririga
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Archibus by EpturaTririga
Considered Both Products
Archibus

No answer on this topic

Tririga
Chose Tririga
They are similar and Tririga probably is a little advanced but other tools such as Manhattan is probably better. I've demo'd that product and it has some valuable attributes. I'd work with either given their capabilities but believe that Tririga could use some updating. I like …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Archibus by EpturaTririga
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Archibus by EpturaTririga
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Archibus by EpturaTririga
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Archibus is well suited for organizations requiring heavy reporting functions, and that have complex processes for managing moves and space chargebacks. It is less well suited for organizations that require input from multiple users (such as doing an employee seating survey).
Read full review
IBM
It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Detail uploads of floor plans
  • Web based portal
  • Customizable service
Read full review
IBM
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Lease Management's data structure may need more flexibility to adopt different business needs.
  • Capital Project Management need simpler interfaces and workflows to improve end user experience.
Read full review
IBM
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
Usability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
User perspective it is simple through a web portal that shows all spaces and buildings. But as an administrator it was quite a bit of work to set up. And by extension updating is also a lot of work
Read full review
IBM
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
Performance
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Archibus compares well with other IWMS software when it comes to integrating with BIM models and reporting capabilities. I selected Archibus as it has all the tools and processes needed to manage space and moves, with the intention to expand to other modules like Lease Administration and Asset Management. The constant upgrades to Archibus also helps to keep the software up-to-date with other third party products such as Revit.
Read full review
IBM
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
Scalability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Met our business objectives
  • Positive ROI
Read full review
IBM
  • It's a positive and works well with the business.
  • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
  • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
Read full review
ScreenShots