Arena.im vs. Hygraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arena.im
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Arena.im is a live chat, live blog, and content wall solution that can be embedded on a website, from the company of the same name headquartered in San Francisco. The solution avails an in-built customer data platform that enables users to activate individual marketing with centralized data and deliver real-time personal experiences to customers.
$99
per month 25,000 page views/month
Hygraph
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month per project
Pricing
Arena.imHygraph
Editions & Modules
Professional
$99
per month 25,000 page views/month
Business
$249
per month 100,000 page views/month
Enterprise
Custom
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arena.imHygraph
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts available for annual subscription.35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arena.imHygraph
Considered Both Products
Arena.im
Chose Arena.im
We did not evaluate any other products as Arena.im fit our needs from the start.
Chose Arena.im
We've only compared Arena against building our own functionality for internal use. We decided that the cost of developing the service, maintaining the server capacity, and maintaining the code was outweighed by the ease of use of Arena's platform. It's difficult to keep server …
Hygraph
Chose Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of …
Features
Arena.imHygraph
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Arena.im
-
Ratings
Hygraph
8.7
Ratings
0% above category average
Collaborative editing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Content templates00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arena.imHygraph
Small Businesses
Medium
Medium
Score 10.0 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Medium
Medium
Score 10.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Quora Blogs / Spaces (discontinued)
Quora Blogs / Spaces (discontinued)
Score 8.7 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arena.imHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arena.imHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
It's well suited for environments where you have chat participants quickly dropping in and out of chat rooms for quick conversations. We use it in a virtual event environment where this is often the case. It's also good for an environment where each chat room has its own moderators who can control the individual rooms. It can also be easily embedded into sites and doesn't require development experience.
Read full review
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to implement
  • Cost effective
  • Strong build vs buy proposition
Read full review
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Cons
  • User Interface
  • Additional functionality for management
  • Set up process for use cases where many chat rooms are required
Read full review
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We did not evaluate any other products as Arena.im fit our needs from the start.
Read full review
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Keeps our website dynamic.
  • Boosts our SEO.
  • Saves us time.
Read full review
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
ScreenShots