ARTEC EMA vs. Microsoft Exchange vs. Smarsh
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARTEC EMA | N/A | N/A | ARTEC IT Solutions, a German company offers EMA to archive e-mail messages, printed documents, files, or voice data (VoIP), stating it can meet individual requirements with its numerous modules and interfaces. EMA's centralization of archiving processes for various content types allows users to consolidate all business-related information in one central archive for the organization. | N/A |
![]() Microsoft Exchange | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Exchange is a secure email / messaging gateway with file archiving and encryption / data loss capability, available as a hosted service (Exchange Online) or installed (Exchange Server). | N/A |
Smarsh | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Smarsh Enterprise Platform is a unified, cloud-native solution designed to future-proof enterprise communications data strategies. Its technologies include elastic compute, natural language processing, machine learning and artificial intelligence. | N/A |
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
No answers on this topic | 94% Would buy again 65 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
No answers on this topic | 97% Delivers good value for the price 63 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
No answers on this topic | 99% Happy with the feature set 68 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 46 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 52 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Email Gateway |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon S3 Glacier Score9 out of 10 | Sophos Email Score9.1 out of 10 | Amazon S3 Glacier Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Google Vault Score9.5 out of 10 | Sophos Email Score9.1 out of 10 | Google Vault Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving Score8.4 out of 10 | OpenText Core Email Threat Protection Score7.5 out of 10 | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving Score8.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.5 | - |
| Availability | - | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | - | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 9.9 | - |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 | - |
| Configurability | - | 7.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 5.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 5.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.0 | - |
| ARTEC EMA | Microsoft Exchange | Smarsh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
|
| ScreenShots |




