TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

atime?s vs. IFS Applications vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    atime?s

    N/AN/AN/A

    $5

    per month

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Microsoft Dynamics SL

    Score5.1 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A
    Pricing
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $5
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    46% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Pay calculation00 Ratings8.03 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files00 Ratings6.33 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    8.7
    5 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    6 Ratings
    23% below category average
    API for custom integration00 Ratings8.75 Ratings6.06 Ratings
    Plug-ins00 Ratings8.75 Ratings6.04 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.7
    10 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Single sign-on capability00 Ratings10.05 Ratings7.49 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.75 Ratings10.09 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    8.7
    5 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.0
    10 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings8.55 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings8.25 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings9.55 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    7.1
    11 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Accounts payable00 Ratings9.55 Ratings6.011 Ratings
    Accounts receivable00 Ratings9.55 Ratings6.08 Ratings
    Global Financial Support00 Ratings9.04 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings9.34 Ratings6.63 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings9.04 Ratings3.04 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.84 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Standardized Processes00 Ratings9.04 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    6 Ratings
    33% below category average
    Inventory tracking00 Ratings9.25 Ratings5.06 Ratings
    Automatic reordering00 Ratings9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management00 Ratings9.55 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.2
    4 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Pricing00 Ratings9.05 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Order entry00 Ratings8.25 Ratings3.04 Ratings
    Credit card processing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.35 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Order Orchestration00 Ratings7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    4 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Billing Management00 Ratings8.24 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings8.84 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings7.74 Ratings6.32 Ratings
    Period Close00 Ratings9.24 Ratings6.04 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    47% below category average
    Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Project Costing00 Ratings6.01 Ratings6.33 Ratings
    Cost Capture00 Ratings5.01 Ratings2.12 Ratings
    Capital Project Management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings2.01 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    67% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.3
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring00 Ratings8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository00 Ratings8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management00 Ratings9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository00 Ratings8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection00 Ratings7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    7.7
    4 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management00 Ratings7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Production Process Design00 Ratings9.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Configuration Management00 Ratings8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution00 Ratings9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Forecasting00 Ratings8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning00 Ratings9.54 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of atime?s and IFS Applications and Microsoft Dynamics SL
    Feature
    atime?s
    -
    Ratings
    IFS Applications
    4.7
    4 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management00 Ratings8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    5.0
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.4
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    3.0
    (7 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.4
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    atime?sIFS ApplicationsMicrosoft Dynamics SL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
    • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
    • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
    • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
    • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
    • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
    • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
    • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Atimeüs
    No answers on this topic
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
    • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
    • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot