TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Bamboo vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Atlassian Bamboo

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AAustralian company Atlassian offers Bamboo, a continuous integration server.

    $1,200

    1 remote agent

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
    Pricing
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Editions & Modules
    1 Remote Agent
    $1200
    5 Remote Agents
    $3200
    10 Remote Agents
    $5840
    25 Remote Agents
    $11,600
    100 Remote Agents
    $23,280
    250 Remote Agents
    $58,160
    500 Remote Agents
    $87,280
    1000 Remote Agents
    $133,840
    2000 Remote Agents
    $187,380
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    71%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Small Businesses
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Octopus Deploy
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.4
    (24 ratings)
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.3
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Atlassian BambooOpenText Application Quality Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atlassian
    If you value integration over cost, Bamboo is clearly the way to go. It offers tight integration to the rest of the Atlassian suite, and when you need traceability from issue to build, Atlassian is the right way to go. However, if you find yourself needing to save on costs, you may consider taking an approach of rolling your own build system with open source alternatives, such as Jenkins, if you don't [mind] putting in a little extra elbow grease.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atlassian
    • Levels of granularity. Organization has many projects that have many build plans that have many jobs that have many tasks, etc. And branch builds allow source control branches to be built separately.
    • Versatility. I can use bamboo to manage my Java, node, or .NET build plans. I can use it to spin up Windows or Linux build agents, or install it on a Mac to build there as well.
    • Bamboo integrates with other Atlassian products like Bitbucket, Stash, JIRA, etc. If a company commits to the entire Atlassian stack then work can be tracked through the whole development lifecycle which is really useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atlassian
    • Extremely hard barrier to entry for non-backend developers
    • Blackbox makes it hard to customize functionality
    • The inability to add features without breaking core functionality
    • No cloud solution
    • Tasks cannot be put in if/else statements
    • No clear right way to form build plans
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Atlassian
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atlassian
    Bamboo offers solid usability for teams looking for an integrated, scalable CI/CD solution, especially those using Atlassian tools. Its interface is intuitive for existing Atlassian users, and its focus on deployment automation makes it a strong option for continuous delivery. However, its complexity and cost may pose challenges for small teams or those new to CI/CD. Overall, Bamboo’s usability shines in environments where ease of integration and streamlined workflows are prioritized. Still, it may require more effort for teams unfamiliar with its setup or without dedicated resources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Atlassian
    Bamboo is a fairly small product but having said that it was fairly easy to get assistance. Especially for the small to easy things. Anything large or fairly complex was an issue finding detailed answers for. This caused a lot of trial and error on our part to try to find a solution.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Atlassian
    We selected Bamboo because its capabilities to integrate with other Atlassian products specially Jira Software, Bitbucket and in some useful scenarios with Confluence. Also, we found these pros important for us: great user interface, easily agent deployment, Docker compability, simply to maintain / manage, and straightforwardly integration with different notification platforms
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Atlassian
    • It helped us achieve the Continuous Deployment and Continuous Integration goals for our applications, a huge milestone that saved a lot of time for developers in making the builds and deployments and saved time for QA in running the automated tests.
    • Helped with DevOps: we moved the formal approval from the email to the system and allowed the approver to actually push the button for the production deployments.
    • Biggest positive impact of using Bamboo is that it improved our response time to customers and increased the frequency of our deliveries to them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots