Atlassian Bitbucket vs. Upsource

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bitbucket
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Bitbucket is a Git repository and code collaboration platform, featuring automated testing and code deployment. Bitbucket Cloud Premium provides AI-powered development, more granular access controls, and enforced code quality, and Bitbucket Data Center provides a self-hosted option.
$0
Upsource
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
for up to 5 users
Standard
$3.30
per month per user
Premium
$6.60
per month per user
Bitbucket Data Center
starting at $44,000
per year 1 - 500
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitbucketUpsource
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Considered Both Products
Bitbucket

No answer on this topic

Upsource
Chose Upsource
Compared to the other tools we evaluated, Upsource was the only tool that allowed distinct reviews without needing explicit pull requests while still being able to go in-depth when required. The diff viewer is serviceable and better than the alternatives, as well, especially …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Bitbucket
7.7
3 Ratings
3% below category average
Upsource
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools4.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.6 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(66 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian BitbucketUpsource
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
As a team we need to push code into the repo on daily basis, Bitbucket has proven that is a reliable and secure server to save and get the code available in no time. The administration part is really easy and there's an extra tool for every developer profile either if you want to use the console or a GUI like Sourcetree.
Read full review
JetBrains
Upsource is the best review tool we've found but it still has some flaws. Notably, it makes reviewing small and quick changes less convenient than they need to be, and diff viewing (especially collaboratively) can be tedious.
It does handle larger, iterative reviews well. Especially when using a feature branch, Upsource will track that branch and automatically add all commits to the review. You can then review the branch as a whole, or look at a subset of diffs.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Very easy to integrate with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and with project/workflow management tools like JIRA.
  • Very efficient in managing security and compliance standards for code, especially during pull requests, merge requests, branching, etc.
  • Very robust in performance, especially the cloud and datacenter versions hardly hit any performance issues and supports more than 2000+ developers in my company.
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Automatically watch git repositories
  • Track all commits in a branch in a single commit
  • Integrates with build server to report build status of specific commits when looking at reviews/commits
  • Integrates with JetBrains IDEs
  • Ability for reviewers to add comments inline and require comments to be resolved before approval
  • Built in diff viewer, both stacked and side-by-side
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • The code management UI is a bit rough around the edges and difficult to work with.
  • BitBucket does not have the same simplified PR management tools as other competitors.
  • It's not as easy to integrate 3rd party apps as other competitors.
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Creating and closing reviews isn't as quick as it could be. You must create a review, assign reviewers, approve and close. I wish there would be a quick review-approve-close for a commit where the change is simple and doesn't require multiple review iterations.
  • Web based interface can be clunky, especially when looking at big diffs side-by-side
  • JetBrains IDE integration is somehow less convenient than going using it in browser.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
All products have room for improvement. The system improves over time with better and better integrations and I look forward to even more features without paying extra! The system has increased transparency across my organization and with this transparency comes increased throughput on projects. I don't think I can go back to any other system and we are definitely married to this product.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
The architecture of Bitbucket makes it more easily scalable than other source code management repositories. Also, administration and maintaining the instance is very easy. It integrates with JIRA and other CI/CD applications which makes it more useful to reduce the efforts. It supports multiple plugins and those bring a lot of extra functionality. It increases the overall efficiency and usefulness of Bitbucket.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
The customer support provided by Atlassian (Bitbucket's parent company that also makes Jira, Confluence, etc.) is very helpful. They seem to be very concerned about any issues reported with their products and even just questions about functionality. They are constantly improving the products with new features in nearly every release. Plus they have a plethora of online documentation to reference.
Read full review
JetBrains
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more familiar tool compared to GitLab. Bitbucket won out because of its close integration with Jira and being in the Atlassian family. It was also cheaper than GitHub. As we started with Jira, Bitbucket addition became a natural next step for us. We really liked Bitbucket and stayed with it but we do know we have great options in the form of GitHub and GitLab should we need to scale fast.
Read full review
JetBrains
Compared to the other tools we evaluated, Upsource was the only tool that allowed distinct reviews without needing explicit pull requests while still being able to go in-depth when required. The diff viewer is serviceable and better than the alternatives, as well, especially the side-by-side viewer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It's allowed for a lot of automation in terms of development workflows. It lets us pursue CI/CD approaches and get releases out faster
  • It has let us get our infrastructure configuration into VCS, which further improves our automation abilities.
  • It has aided in keeping track of changes, and allows us to keep workflows organized so we can track the status of development
Read full review
JetBrains
  • Increased our code base quality
  • Reduced the number of bugs found after deployment (bugs are found in review and fixed before deploy)
  • Improved knowledge sharing
Read full review
ScreenShots