TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AtomicWriter

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AAtomicWriter helps users create original content optimized to maximize visibility for content marketing campaigns.N/A

    DemandScience

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ADemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
    Pricing
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Considered Both Products
    Atomic Reach
    No answer on this topic
    DemandScience
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Would buy again
    66 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    64 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    67 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    60 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    63 Answers
    Features
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Content Creation
    Comparison of Content Creation features of AtomicWriter and DemandScience
    Feature
    AtomicWriter
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    25% above category average
    DemandScience
    -
    Ratings
    Ideation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval workflows10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content collaboration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content calendar10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network for content licensing/production10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Publishing
    Comparison of Content Publishing features of AtomicWriter and DemandScience
    Feature
    AtomicWriter
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    18% above category average
    DemandScience
    -
    Ratings
    Content hub10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Forms / Gated content10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Embedded CTAs10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content distribution9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of AtomicWriter and DemandScience
    Feature
    AtomicWriter
    8.2
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    DemandScience
    7.8
    17 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Audience profiling and targeting7.01 Ratings8.617 Ratings
    Closed-loop tracking and reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content performance analytics8.01 Ratings7.614 Ratings
    Campaign optimization dashboard9.01 Ratings7.210 Ratings
    Competitive analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Small Businesses
    Contently
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Contently
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    CoSchedule Marketing Suite
    Score10 out of 10
    CoSchedule Marketing Suite
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    PathFactory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    PathFactory
    Score8.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (75 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (69 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.5
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AtomicWriterDemandScience
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atomic Reach
    AtomicWriter is especially suitable for blog writing and for this type of work. It also gives different formats and restructures it with a great view. I think that's it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DemandScience
    Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atomic Reach
    • Makes my writing awesome.
    • Restructures it.
    • Gives me different writing formats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DemandScience
    • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
    • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
    • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
    • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
    • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atomic Reach
    • Nothing too bad.
    • Needs more features.
    • Should be less expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DemandScience
    • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
    • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Atomic Reach
    No answers on this topic
    DemandScience
    Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atomic Reach
    No answers on this topic
    DemandScience
    The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Atomic Reach
    No answers on this topic
    DemandScience
    Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Atomic Reach
    No answers on this topic
    DemandScience
    They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Atomic Reach
    No answers on this topic
    DemandScience
    I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Atomic Reach
    • Nothing at all
    • -
    • -
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    DemandScience
    • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
    • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
    • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots