Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication vs. PingOne from Ping Identity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
To help ysers simplify and secure their login experience, Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is presented as a complete and easy to deploy login solution that offers multi-token and tokenless technology, password replacement, and a single-sign-on solution for on-premises and Cloud applications. MFA Benefits: · Passwordless and deviceless logins with pattern-based authentication and…N/A
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…
$20,000
per year
Pricing
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$800 per installationNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Considered Both Products
Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication
Chose Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication
The only advantage of Google Authenticator is that it is free. Authlogics has many more features than Google Authenticator especially 1.5 MFA which is unique to it. It has official support which comes in handy when users face authentication issues or the radius servers having …
PingOne from Ping Identity
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
The Ping products work. They can integrate with any application. They are significantly more reliable. The vendor is responsive and works with us. Other solutions are unreliable, the vendors are inflexible, their solutions are inflexible, and their support is inflexible. These …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
All contenders were capable, but we had scale concerns with NetIQ's architecture. In the end, what set Ping apart from the others was their level of engagement in understanding our use cases up front during the RFP stage and how they were focused on what we needed more than …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
I found both platforms compelling from an ease of use and user experience perspective. The decider for me was cost driven as I had already used Ping to drive a self-service transformation in a prior organization, and I intended to do the same at this one. Okta had issues with …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will …
Features
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication
-
Ratings
PingOne from Ping Identity
9.3
Ratings
12% above category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dashlane Password Manager
Dashlane Password Manager
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Authlogics Multi-Factor AuthenticationPingOne from Ping Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
Authlogics can be used anywhere there is a need for second factor authentication. Moreover, if you care about users and want something easy for them to use then 1.5 MFA from Authlogics is a blessing. However, if you have the need the users should use their device or something they have always then this is not the ideal solution.
Read full review
The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year.
Read full review
Pros
  • Second Factor Authentication
  • Integration
  • User Manager
  • Deviceless Authentication
Read full review
  • It is very simple to onboard the application
  • It provide lot of flexibility with SSO functions
  • It helped reducing the cost.
Read full review
Cons
  • Auto Update
  • User Onboarding
Read full review
  • There are times that the response time is quite slow.
  • Since this is built on Google Cloud, there are moments when we encounter errors when logging in or looping in Google.
  • UI could be improved.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The only advantage of Google Authenticator is that it is free. Authlogics has many more features than Google Authenticator especially 1.5 MFA which is unique to it. It has official support which comes in handy when users face authentication issues or the radius servers having problems. Moreover, it can be integrated with active directory providing a central place of administration for your users.
Read full review
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 0 incidents of MFA theft
  • Universal User Acceptance
  • Meeting various security standards
Read full review
  • Flexibility is key, we can integrate with any solution.
  • Single control plane for all authentication.
  • A single provider for all authentication needs simplifies the stack and solution, and therefore the maintenance experience for users.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Authlogics Multi-Factor Authentication Screenshots

Screenshot of Authlogics MFA technologies include PINgrid, PINphrase, PINpass, biometrics, and Yubikeys.Screenshot of Why choose Authlogics MFA?Screenshot of Authlogics Authenticator Mobile App is available.