| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Autodesk Forma Build | Score9.6 out of 10 | N/A | Autodesk Forma Build, previously known as Autodesk Build and originally based on PlanGrid, is a Construction Management and Job Site Management application within the Autodesk Forma suite. It provides contractors, owners, and subcontractors with a unified platform for project collaboration and information management across the construction and operations lifecycle. | $100 per month |
| Autodesk Forma Build | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | $800 / year for 1 user when billed annually. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Autodesk Forma Build | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Autodesk Build
Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build BlueBeam is a program that some of our customers use as their management tool. It is a little more cumbersome than Plan Grid. We would certainly prefer using PlanGrid over other products that we have tried. Our field staff prefers to have a consistent platform to share the … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build Plangrid would sit in between these two when it comes to mobile job site collaboration and document management. Procore is more a full-featured product but it is 2X-3X the cost and there is some question whether the extra costs actual turns in to an ROI at the end of the day. … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build The programs are not exactly parallel, however, we formerly posted RFIs on Bluebeam and by owner request we are now using Plangrid. I have found that this feature on Plangrid is slightly more intuitive and the interface is more user-friendly. Bluebeam, on the other hand, has … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build PlanGrid is great for quickly communicating information within the field, however, its office capabilities are more limited compared to some alternative software I have used. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build I feel that PlanGrid is much more useful in our organization than Procore due to the extra features and value Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build We selected to use PlanGrid over the traditional Word/Excel combination for its ease of use, and streamlining of the process. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build It's easier to use, more user-friendly, has ready access, and is more cost effective. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build I feel that Plangrid does a good job at combining most of the best attributes of the above programs into one solid software. Finishline seems to be a bit stronger punchlist tool but it doesnt have any other features, can't be used a doc control, etc. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build PlanGrid has several more features in one location, as opposed to using multiple programs to accomplish the same task. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build I've never used anything like PlanGrid. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Autodesk Build Have both but like PlanGrid much better. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
80% Would buy again 4 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Autodesk Forma Build | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction Project & Field Management |
|
| Autodesk Forma Build | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Autodesk Forma Design Collaborate Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Bluebeam Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Revit Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Autodesk Forma Build | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 |
| Usability | 9.8 |
| Support Rating | 9.0 |
| Autodesk Forma Build | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | Autodesk Forma Build Screenshots      |
