Autodesk ShotGrid vs. Frame.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ShotGrid
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ShotGrid is a production management and review toolset for VFX, animation, and games teams. ShotGrid is equipped to handle creative production tracking needs, supporting teams from large to smaller studios.
$45
per month per user
Frame.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Frame.io is a video collaboration platform, supporting the video editing process by providing creative teams with time stamped comments, annotations and hashtags, and an accelerated sharing and approval process.
$15
per user/per month
Pricing
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$15
per user/per month
Team
$25
per user/per month
Free
Free
For up to 2 users
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ShotGridFrame.io
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Features
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Creative Collaboration
Comparison of Creative Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk ShotGrid
-
Ratings
Frame.io
8.6
50 Ratings
11% above category average
Variety of file types00 Ratings9.347 Ratings
Configurable and automated workflows00 Ratings8.139 Ratings
Audit trail00 Ratings8.645 Ratings
Real-time collaboration00 Ratings8.648 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Small Businesses
Frame.io
Frame.io
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(54 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(49 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk ShotGridFrame.io
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
ShotGrid seems to be well suited for a video team for reviews and project tracking. It may not be well suited for Project managers who need to see the bigger picture of the project.
Read full review
Adobe
On a video-by-video basis, Frame.io works perfectly to track comments on individual files. It allows us to bring in different stakeholders and has significantly increased our Creative synergy between our company and clients. The speed at which we can now provide access to assets has removed much of the ambiguity we faced in the past.
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Uploads videos efficiently
  • allows annotation within the video
  • setting custom filters
  • creating Gantt chart with inputs from each editor and animator
  • adding versions to shot/asset
  • adding assets to a shot
Read full review
Adobe
  • Allows clients to make frame-specific notes, so there is no confusion what they are talking about.
  • When multiple stakeholders are making notes, platform automatically sorts them chronologically in the video.
  • Multiple stakeholders giving notes can see when their note conflicts with a colleague's.
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • Ordering comments made by different people by timecode/frame number, instead by the time and date the comment was made
  • Being able to move an uploaded video from shots to assets and vice versa. Right now we have to re-upload but lose any comments made already if they were in the wrong place
  • Custom filters are great but they could get a little confusing with all the options. Might help with guidelines or a place we could ask what we want and someone could answer with the best way to achieve those specific filters we want
Read full review
Adobe
  • When I mark a video private, it should disable the sharing link. We’ve run into issues where we’ve made a video private, thinking that it was no longer visible, but those with the link could still view it.
  • Mobile version is great, but sometimes I have to rotate my phone to get the full feature set, which is a little clunky sometimes.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
For education, we can't see ourselves using anything else that comes at a cost
Read full review
Adobe
It works well for our small team, but we’ve run into some friction as things scale. Getting external users set up with the right access can be a bit of a hassle, and the cost starts to add up as we bring on more people and projects. That said, it’s still a solid tool, it definitely speeds up our workflow and works seamlessly with Adobe products.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
It's UI/UX is very robust. There's a lot of functionality but it's not very intuitive or intuitive. I spend time with new hires and contractors to overview ShotGrid for a day and revisit after a week or two. Questions always arise down the line
Read full review
Adobe
I've used other video review systems, Frame was the only one I didn't question how they allowed you to review - I just started reviewing. It's that simple. It's easy to set up projects, invite collaborators, and then provide a final cut for download. It's naturally built for the kind of work that TV/Film & video production companies do.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Adobe
I haven't experienced any outages with Frame.io.
Read full review
Performance
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Adobe
When sharing videos for feedback, there are no noticeable performance issues with Frame.io. Everyone is able to complete their tasks without the program getting in the way.
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Adobe
I've only reached out to Frame.io a few times but they responded quickly and offered achievable solutions. The fact that I haven't had to reach out to them more is proof that the platform is easy to use, reliable, and can run on its own. The only issues we have had were related to uploading issues on our end.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
Wipster had limitations on video uploads, which was a major drawback. One thing we liked with Wipster was how we can see comments made in order on the timeline while watching the video.
Read full review
Adobe
We utilize both Synthesia and Frame.io for different projects. Frame.io we use for editing actual video content that has been captured. Primary use is for customer training and education. We use Synthesia for short-form video production, primarily for software screen recording demonstrations, and for translation functionality (which is excellent).
Read full review
Scalability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Adobe
Frame.io was very easy to scale to the appropriate teams needed
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • We spend less time going back and forth with different stakeholders on shots and assets
  • We don't have to pay services that only provided trial versions
  • There is unlimited video uploading which was not the case with wiz
Read full review
Adobe
  • Frame.io has shortened our review time considerably, saving time.
  • Frame.io is wonderful for managing a large team of editors, especially for us when we are using in-house staff and contractors.
  • Frame.io has improved the relationship between departments, which was more tense with previous review methods.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Frame.io Screenshots

Screenshot of the main home pageScreenshot of a specific projectScreenshot of the mobile appScreenshot of collectionsScreenshot of collections