What users are saying about
24 Ratings
29 Ratings
24 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.8 out of 100
29 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • AWS CodeBuild is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

9.0

AWS CodeBuild

90%
1 Rating
6.0

Travis CI

60%
8 Ratings

Usability

AWS CodeBuild

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0

Travis CI

50%
1 Rating

Support Rating

AWS CodeBuild

N/A
0 Ratings
4.0

Travis CI

40%
2 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Amazon AWS

It is really good for building projects in the cloud. If you try to do build the project first locally and then push that stack to the cloud it could take a lot of time. In this way, it also consumes a lot of resources in the computer and in the network.
Read full review

Open Source

TravisCI is suited for workflows involving typical software development but unfortunately I think the software needs more improvement to be up to date with current development systems and TravisCI hasn't been improving much in that space in terms of integrations.
Read full review

Pros

Amazon AWS

  • Customization
  • Do code builds within a schedule or when the source code changes
  • Only pay for the build time used
Read full review

Open Source

  • It is very simple to configure a range of environment versions and settings in a simple YAML file.
  • It integrates very well with Github, Bitbucket, or a private Git repo.
  • The Travis CI portal beautifully shows you your history and console logs. Everything is presented in a very clear and intuitive interface.
Read full review

Cons

Amazon AWS

  • Sometimes it runs an outage and developers don't know why. We have to contact DevOps most of the time.
  • Sometimes it is slow
Read full review

Open Source

  • I think they could have a cheaper personal plan. I'd love to use Travis on personal projects, but I don't want to publish them nor I can pay $69 a month for personal projects that I don't want to be open source.
  • There is no interface for configuring repos on Travis CI, you have to do it via a file in the repo. This make configuration very flexible, but also makes it harder for simpler projects and for small tweaks in the configuration.
Read full review

Pricing Details

AWS CodeBuild

Starting Price

$1 Per Minute

Editions & Modules

AWS CodeBuild editions and modules pricing
EditionModules
general.1.small$.0051
general.1.medium$.012
general.1.large$.023

Footnotes

  1. Per Minute
  2. Per Minute
  3. Per Minute

Offerings

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

No setup fee

Additional Details

Travis CI

Starting Price

$0

Editions & Modules

Travis CI editions and modules pricing
EditionModules
Free PlanFree1
1 Concurrent Job Plan692
2 Concurrent Jobs Plan1293
5 Concurrent Jobs Plan2494

Offerings

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

No setup fee

Additional Details

Usability

Amazon AWS

No answers on this topic

Open Source

TravisCI hasn't had much changes made to its software and has thus fallen behind compared to many other CI/CD applications out there. I can only give it a 5 because it does what it is supposed to do but lacks product innovation.
Read full review

Support Rating

Amazon AWS

No answers on this topic

Open Source

After the private equity firm had bought this company the innovation and support has really gone downhill a lot. I am not a fan that they have gutted the software trying to make money from it and put innovation and product development second.
Read full review

Alternatives Considered

Amazon AWS

AWS CodeBuild provides the option to fully implement the build in the cloud without wasting your local resources (computer and network) providing independence to developers to invest those resources in other processes. It also provides a robust platform with a lot of customizations or just a script for each language.
Read full review

Open Source

Jenkins is much more complicated to configure and start using. Although, one you have done that, it's extremely powerful and full of features. Maybe many more than Travis CI. As per TeamCity, I would never go back to using it. It's also complicated to configure but it is not worth the trouble. Codeship supports integration with GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket. I've only used it briefly, but it seems to be a nice tool.
Read full review

Return on Investment

Amazon AWS

  • It has a positive ROI
Read full review

Open Source

  • It's improved my ability to deliver working code, increasing my development velocity.
  • It increases confidence that your own work (and those of external contributors) does not have any obvious bugs, provided you have sufficient test coverage.
  • It helps to ensure consistent standards across a team (you can integrate process elements like "go lint" and other style checks as part of your build).
  • It's zero-cost for public/open source projects, so the only investment is a few minutes setting up a build configuration file (hence the return is very high).
  • The .travis.yml file is a great way for onboarding new developers, since it shows how to bootstrap a build environment and run a build "from scratch".
Read full review

Add comparison