Azure Application Gateway vs. Azure Load Balancer vs. IBM API Connect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Application Gateway
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Application Gateway is a platform-managed, scalable, and highly available application delivery controller as a service with integrated web application firewall.N/A
Azure Load Balancer
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Load Balancer provides built-in load balancing for cloud services and virtual machines, so the user can create highly-available and scalable applications in minutes.
$0.01
Per Rule Per Hour
IBM API Connect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM API Connect is a scalable API solution that helps organizations implement a robust API strategy by creating, exposing, managing and monetizing an entire API ecosystem across multiple clouds. As businesses embrace their digital transformation journey, APIs become critical to unlock the value of business data and assets. With increasing adoption of APIs, consistency and governance are needed across the enterprise. API Connect aims to help businesses…N/A
Pricing
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Additional Rules
$0.01
Per Rule Per Hour
First 5 Rules
$0.025
Per Hour
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Considered Multiple Products
Azure Application Gateway
Chose Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway provides seamless integration with azure services and platforms like azure load balancer, azure monitor, also it offer advanced load balancing capabilities and build in WAF Functionality.
Chose Azure Application Gateway
Other load balancing tools in Azure (Azure LB and Azure Traffic Manager) are limited in their functionality in comparison with the Azure Application Gateway, and also, they don't provide security features. Azure Firewall, although it has security features, is more expensive, …
Chose Azure Application Gateway
I have my dependency application in Azure Application Gateway. I had to use this, and it has all the features we were looking for.
Chose Azure Application Gateway
HAProxy is an excellent load balancer that can also be used in cloud environments (and we do!), and is relied by hyper-large enterprises globally as well. However, HAProxy is a little bit more rudimentary in feature space, it does the core job well and securely, but doesn't …
Chose Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway gives you application-level routing and load-balancing services that let you build a scalable and highly-available web front end in Azure.
Azure Load Balancer

No answer on this topic

IBM API Connect
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect can in some use cases, especially when customer requirements are highly security centric, provide a more robust approach to managing access, performance, and trust, in the IT estate. In many cases it boils down to customer preference and to some extent if the …
Chose IBM API Connect
I think it could be improved but overall it is very good.

Creo que podria mejorarse pero en general es muy bueno.
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Apigee Edge
Chose IBM API Connect
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Chose IBM API Connect
In our organization, we chose IBM API Connect for the easy integration
Chose IBM API Connect
Our organization chose IBM API Connect because, in our experience, IBM is more resilient
Chose IBM API Connect
Apigee Edge and Kong Konnect
Chose IBM API Connect
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood …
Chose IBM API Connect
Ease of use of the product and pricing of the product.
Chose IBM API Connect
Prior to adopting IBM API Connect, there were two main competitors, MuleSoft. Although in the integration capabilities MuleSoft seemed to have an advantage, and regarding developer experience, IBM API Connect had a set of enterprise features for the API management.
Chose IBM API Connect
Mulesoft seemed to take a lot longer to implement and reach any real ROI attribution. For the other competitors, I'd say they are easier to administrate, but this isn't as important to us as a business user. It was easier to explore APIs with IBM than it was with others.
Chose IBM API Connect
From a cost perspective, IBM is more convenient and has a broader portfolio of features, which results in a better tool.
Chose IBM API Connect
There were multiple product we read and then shortlist were taken as POC against IBM API Connect.
-Google Apigee : is good but in cross cloud there are concerns. Also, feature of reading & identifying the target system certificate was not available there.
Chose IBM API Connect
It was organizational boundaries to use IBM API Connect but we have learnt so many think on this technology. Obviously, We have more experience on this it;s easy for us to configure and maintain the system.
Chose IBM API Connect
Its depend on the business use case. Sometime we have to got through the in deep to technologies so we can;t use such built-in kind of services.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect have more feature compared to other solutions like from one platform we can create APIs on the API Manager, we can publish the APIs to the products/portal server, we can secure the APIs using IBM DataPower Gateway, we can socalize the APIs using developer …
Chose IBM API Connect
We choice IBM API Connect because Apigee is more manual when you create an API Proxy
Chose IBM API Connect
We use IBM Cloud, which works well with our hybrid cloud deployment. As a large firm, we are able to scale as required once the initial setup is complete.
Chose IBM API Connect
Never used any product of the IBM environment together.
Chose IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect is more flexible and easy to use. It has a lot of features that differ in the market like API monetization & analytics.
Features
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Application Gateway
-
Ratings
Azure Load Balancer
-
Ratings
IBM API Connect
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
API access control00 Ratings00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
API usage data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
API user onboarding00 Ratings00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
API versioning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Usage billing and payments00 Ratings00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
API monitoring and logging00 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Application GatewayAzure Load BalancerIBM API Connect
Likelihood to Recommend
The best practice for a cloud environment is to use the tools provided by the cloud provider. That's why for Azure cloud, Azure Application Gateway is the most cost-effective solution that you can use. You can use a single Azure Application Gateway instance for load balancing WAF, URL-based routing, and more.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Overall, it can be stated that IBM API Connect has many benefits and can easily manage complicated integrations. The platform performs best in large environments, especially where microservices and processing of multiple API dependencies are required. On average, we have processed thousands of API calls within a second with good response time.
Read full review
Pros
  • Uploading images by multiple end-users from several applications like web, mobile, etc.
  • When there is a high volume of data requests, it helps to queue them based on the type of request. So it's easy to serve and reduce the loading time from the application layer.
  • An application gateway is useful when it can identify the type of details the user is requesting.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • API discovery feature is very helpful to allow us to scope the work required before diving into things.
  • The ability to set permissions and rulesets at a user level is essential to restrict access to specific datasets.
  • Ability for external users (those from outside our organisation) to leverage the API in more restrictive manner.
Read full review
Cons
  • More cost-effective pricing plans are welcome for the future, especially for WAF
  • Ability to automate the TLS certificate renewal procedure
  • Ability to manage non-HTTP traffic
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • That being stated, every thing you own will have both positive and negative aspects to its use. It can be perplexing at times, particularly when navigating between different functions.
  • However, based on my usage of this application up until this point, I've discovered that the only time it lags is when it's downloading updates. Otherwise, it's excellent to utilise for all other customs.
Read full review
Usability
Most of the Application Gateway's features and services can be managed and re-configured via either the Azure Portal GUI or via the Azure Cloud Shell, thus allowing both CLI modes, i.e. Azure CLI (Bash) and Azure Powershell. The v2 version of Application Gateway has significantly improved performance during initial configuration or during re-configuration changes, thus making it much more usable for IT admins, as compared to v1.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
IBM API Connect may be less appropriate for small-scale projects with minimal API management requirements, where simpler and more cost-effective solutions suffice. Organizations lacking the necessary technical expertise or resources to harness its full potential may face implementation challenges. In static environments with infrequent API changes or limited developer engagement, the platform's comprehensive features may be excessive for the task at hand.
Read full review
Support Rating
I don’t like that it's part of the Microsoft brand. In general, I am not a fan of Microsoft products but Azure gets it right.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
HAProxy is an excellent load balancer that can also be used in cloud environments (and we do!), and is relied by hyper-large enterprises globally as well. However, HAProxy is a little bit more rudimentary in feature space, it does the core job well and securely, but doesn't provide any fancy additional features. Also, it takes more effort to deploy HAProxy than simply using an in-built feature in the Azure stack.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Our decision to adopt IBM API Connect was driven by its comprehensive end-to-end API lifecycle management, which proved to be exceptionally well-suited to our B2B, Open Banking, and multi-fintech integration requirements. When compared with other solutions, API Connect stood out for its ability to externalize and govern APIs at scale, while offering enterprise-grade capabilities critical for our regulated environment. IBM App Connect serves as our internal integration middleware, focused on backend orchestration and data transformation. IBM watsonx acts as a complementary AI and data platform for exposing intelligent services especially with the code assistant functionality, it is API Connect that provides the crucial layer for external API exposure, management, and monetization. IBM DataPower is an incredibly secure and performant runtime, and lacks key enterprise features such as developer engagement, full API governance, and analytics. API Connect fills that gap seamlessly, offering a unified, secure, and scalable API management experience.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We are using Azure Application Gateway as the load balancing tool for our applications deployed on Azure Kubernetes Services (AKS) clusters.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • It has decreased the average development time of an API by 15%.
  • It has simplified the monitoring and tracking of development, keeping it simple and in one place.
  • It has reduced the time wasted looking for information; it has reduced the mail loop sharing status and questions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM API Connect Screenshots

Screenshot of API tests and insightsScreenshot of API Manager customization interfaceScreenshot of the API designer