Likelihood to Recommend To better serve their consumers, businesses that often interact with those clients who rely on Microsoft's software products may consider migrating to Azure. This program would be useful in any installation of a Microsoft product or suite that necessitates a test of the target environment. It is simple to maintain and implement, making it an ideal IT backbone. If a client doesn't have any use for this particular instrument, it's not going to be of any benefit to them.
Read full review JAMS is well suited for centralizing schedules. We have hundreds of databases, and JAMS has allowed us to centralize the scheduling of all of the individual jobs related to each individual database. This allows certain teams to follow the activity of specific jobs without having to access the individual servers on which the databases reside.
Read full review Pros Ease of scripting Scheduling Combination of Data Sets Read full review Watching for files Running Power shell scripts JOB notifications of failures to teams Being able to interface / run other programs as either dos window, Power shell window, Python window through configurable execution methods Purging JAMS history by Parameters, like dates and # of copies to keep of a job Being able to configure a hot backup to take over in the event a Primary JAMS Server goes down, the backup automatically kicks in after 3 minutes. - High Availability mode Being able to set up variables that can be used in JOBs / Sequences to hold login information (encrypted), date ranges or other Job Parameter values. And be able to programmatically updated by Power shell scripts to track progress between runs of the same job: count of orders processed, API Skip values when retrieving orders, when the API call only returns X amount per call and you need to get all available orders with multiple calls JOB logs can be put anywhere on network for other users to access - IT allowing of course. With the high availability option, this is Great, since you don't have to check each of the JAMS Servers for a log when a fail over occures Read full review Cons The UI could be a little more clearer in my opinion. Password resets would be nice to have in any instance (not just the default area). Easier to migrate repeated account that may have been created. Read full review Prior to JAMS I organized various batch job runs with a user friendly naming process (job, machine, date, etc). I had to jump through hoops to get JAMS to replicate by having a post-completion job rename and copy the log. Natively support JAMS commands in Powershell7. Failsafe guard to prevent runaway jobs that submit other JAMS jobs that were improperly coded. i.e. A throttle setting for new JOBS. I once had production go down when hundreds of jobs used up our daily license allocation in under a minute. I have similar (but different) Execution Methods that would benefit from a shared template. Current setup is awkward to change. I'd love my job Definitions to be natively linked to github for version control. Read full review Likelihood to Renew JAMS is an essential application within our organization. There is no chance that at any point in the foreseeable future we would migrate off of the platform or stop our maintenance contract. HelpSystems (now rebranded Forta) releases frequent updates which always add value to the product. The system's reliability and extensibility has earned our trust that it will scale with our organization.
Read full review Usability At first its not 100% obvious what each item is meant for. When you look at the list for the first time there are a lot of objects, its taken some time to figure out what each one does. Once you figure out what each one does it makes more sense.
Read full review Reliability and Availability JAMS has been super reliable in our implementation. The only reason it isn't a 10 is the web client isn't fully functional so the availability suffers very mildly there
Read full review Performance JAMS performs well but the client some times take a little longer than normal to display logs and new views.
Read full review Support Rating We had a very aggressive timeline to look for a new batch job processor that is compatible with our new server that could help us maintain and improve our current data processing procedure. The JAMS support team was there to address our inquiries promptly. On average, their response times have been within 24 hours, ensuring that we receive assistance when we need it
Read full review Implementation Rating I Was not part of the original Implementation, and the persons did that are no longer with the Organization. But I was part of the recent Upgrade process a year ago and I am the JAMS admin and was very pleased
Read full review Alternatives Considered Both are excellent resources that successfully deliver the promised benefits. Two rival businesses, each with its own distinct culture and set of goals. As far as IT assistance goes, I find Azure's user interface to be slightly more intuitive. Both resources are valuable and have their advantages and disadvantages. Both are crucial if you run a fast-paced business with a large consumer base.
Read full review JAMS is easier to use, provides more features and was easier to manage form a central location. simple features in JAMS were missing from
VisualCron such as a projected daily schedule. The install setup with a client and agents was better suited for us too
Read full review Contract Terms and Pricing Model i didnt have any involvement in the sales process, however we purchased the product so it had to be decent.
Read full review Scalability I can only speak in in regards to scalability in the volume of jobs we have created. Many of our jobs exist in multiple environments, with each environment having its own unique folder names, connection strings, etc. We incorporate parameters on the folder level that contain the unique environment information. The jobs reference these values from the folder they are contained in, so we can easily copy a job from DEV to TEST and the source is the same but the values passed from the parameters are not. This makes it very easy to create many new jobs and copy them across multiple environments and have them work
Read full review Professional Services i didnt have any involvement in the sales process, however we purchased the product so it had to be decent.
Read full review Return on Investment After setting things up we have reduced time in running all of the processing It is promising in allowing us to concentrate on the data rather than the formatting and presentation that can all be automated after it has been processed We have reduced the number of products we used before adopting Batch Read full review JAMS was not the most cost-effective solution to the original program we were implementing at my Agency; but we were able to expand on the services we do provide using it's power and flexibility to enhance other program areas. The cost-model from MVPSI has been great in allowing us to deploy a DEVELOPMENT, STAGING, then PRODUCTION scheduler integrating the platform into our SDLC. Read full review ScreenShots