TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Dedicated Host vs. IBM Power Virtual Server vs. Microsoft Azure

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Dedicated Host

    N/AN/AAzure Dedicated Host provides physical servers that host one or more Azure virtual machines. The user's server is dedicated to the organization and its workloads—capacity isn't shared with other customers. This host-level isolation helps address compliance requirements. As the host is provisioned, the user gains visibility into and control over the placement of Azure VMs, and determines the host's maintenance policies.N/A

    IBM Power Virtual Server

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/AIBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads​.N/A

    Microsoft Azure

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.

    $29

    per month

    Pricing
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Developer
    $29
    per month
    Standard
    $100
    per month
    Professional Direct
    $1000
    per month
    Basic
    Free
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThe free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    IBM Power System Virtual Server, in my opinion, is more cost-effective for small and medium-sized organizations than Microsoft Azure. When contrasted with Microsoft Azure, IBM Cloud offers superior load balancing, continuous performance, and network monitoring. There is …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    The deployment time period for IBM Power System Virtual Server is very less as compared to Microsoft Azure. It is also simpler to use as compared to Microsoft Azure. The response time is great and the chances of error are minimum. IBM Power System Virtual Server is the future …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    First and foremost, I believe that IBM Power System Virtual Server is significantly less expensive than Microsoft Azure, making it more affordable for small and medium-sized businesses. The IBM Cloud provides the finest load balancing, continuous performance, and network …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    When compared to IBM Power System Virtual Server, Microsoft Azure was a more expensive tool with a response time that was approximately one-tenth as fast. When compared to other platforms, Amazon Web Services is extremely safe and dependable, which makes it a fantastic and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    One of the greatest alternatives to IBM Power System Virtual Server is Microsoft Azure. First, I'd want to point out that it's a lot more expensive than the competition. Because it is less expensive than other virtual servers, even small and medium-sized businesses may afford …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    When compared to the IBM Power System Virtual Server, Microsoft Azure is a little more costly. Because of its working abilities, IBM is a formidable rival in the software industry. It has the capability of supporting a wide range of operating-system configurations. In terms of …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    Firstly I can say IBM Power System Virtual Server is much better with respect to cost when compared to Microsoft Azure which is good for small and medium scale industries to afford. IBM facilitates Load Balancing, continuous Performance, and Network Monitoring features which …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    Microsoft Azure is one of the best alternatives for IBM Power System Virtual Server. Coming to comparison, firstly I must say about its pricing level. When compared to other virtual servers it is less in cost where even middle and low-level enterprises can make use of it. IBM …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    Microsoft Azure is a bit expensive when compared to IBM Power System Virtual Server. IBM is a tough competitor in the software world with its working ability. It has the ability to support a number of operating systems. Features in IBM Power System Virtual Server are more and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    The IBM Power System Virtual Server enables you to make use of sophisticated artificial intelligence. IBM Systems are well-suited for running virtually any type of application. It is beneficial to utilize a single platform in order to prevent doing superfluous operations and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    As I usually say, if you are looking for a solid environment, I always advocate going with IBM Power Server because, so far, it has shown to be successful for my company. Always keep usage under control; in certain circumstances, such as during peak hours, you may see a slight …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    We don't have any comparison with IBM's excellent playing quality with proper security as Compared to other virtual servers. Overall IBM POWER SYSTEM VIRTUAL SERVER is the best.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    I've used a variety of other operating systems servers, including RHEL, Windows Servers, and then IBM Power System Virtual Server, but IBM Power System Virtual Server has provided excellent performance, reliability, and scalability, and I highly recommend it. There are fewer …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    IBM Power System Virtual Server has proven really advantageous to our company, allowing us to finish a restricted number of tasks in a shorter amount of time. Due to its dependability, efficiency, and speed, it has been our first choice for many years. The price is quite low …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    When compared to other system components, the IBM Power System offers more stability and uptime than the competition. Installing and configuring the IBM Power System Virtual Server was a breeze. Because of the simplicity with which the system may be scaled, no mistakes have …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    We might use IBM Power System Virtual Server in situations when we need to swiftly import new data. In terms of speed and performance, it's just too excellent. Even the cost is reasonable, and upkeep is likewise a piece of cake. When compared to other virtual servers, IBM Power …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    Companies may quickly modify the models they employ to perform a given task with the help of IBM Power System Virtual Server. For even better decision-making by companies, IBM Power System Virtual Server links with AI from trusted sources. Profitability is supported by the …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    Other products didn't have a competitive hybrid cloud model and were primarily cloud-based. All of the other providers that we considered were much more expensive when viewed from a dedicated server standpoint. To ensure that we get the right business support, we chose to work …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    IBM Power System Virtual Server allows you to use powerful AI. IBM Systems are well designed to run any kind of application. It helps to use a single platform to avoid unnecessary activities and actions to maintain. It is going to be the one as competitive for all the virtual …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    The only option I know of is to run IBM I servers.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    It is more effective and efficient towards the tasks. [IBM Power System] Virtual servers also have the most complete option to create reports for our management. IBM Power System Virtual Server solved our issues with security and helped us to secure our business. And this …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Power Virtual Server
    IBM is very competitive and has most of the same features as the other products. The other products did not have a cost-competitive hybrid cloud model and primarily were cloud-based.
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    193 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    34 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    187 Answers
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    31 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    194 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    35 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    165 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    24 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    177 Answers
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    34 Answers
    Features
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Azure Dedicated Host and IBM Power Virtual Server and Microsoft Azure
    Feature
    Azure Dedicated Host
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Power Virtual Server
    8.6
    197 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Microsoft Azure
    8.4
    27 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime00 Ratings8.9195 Ratings8.126 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling00 Ratings8.8195 Ratings8.725 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing00 Ratings9.8189 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates00 Ratings9.7190 Ratings8.225 Ratings
    Monitoring tools00 Ratings7.0194 Ratings8.326 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images00 Ratings9.7191 Ratings8.424 Ratings
    Operating system support00 Ratings8.9193 Ratings8.926 Ratings
    Security controls00 Ratings8.0192 Ratings8.626 Ratings
    Automation00 Ratings7.0168 Ratings8.224 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.8
    (195 ratings)
    8.7
    (96 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (17 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    8.3
    (36 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (27 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Dedicated HostIBM Power Virtual ServerMicrosoft Azure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It is really impactful in terms of scenarios like ERP systems and Data Analytics where heavy data needs to be analysed in terms of volume and their needs to be high scalability offering so in that scenario it is a great asset and features like distribution of workload using AI capabilities by leveraging modern IBM offerings like Watson is really helpful the area in which it could improve is native development of application in terms of adoption of New cloud Technologies
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Azure is particularly well suited for enterprise environments with existing Microsoft investments, those that require robust compliance features, and organizations that need hybrid cloud capabilities that bridge on-premises and cloud infrastructure. In my opinion, Azure is less appropriate for cost-sensitive startups or small businesses without dedicated cloud expertise and scenarios requiring edge computing use cases with limited connectivity. Azure offers comprehensive solutions for most business needs but can feel like there is a higher learning curve than other cloud-based providers, depending on the product and use case.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • It is good in managing our documents in a precise manner.
    • It is a comprehensive tool and supports other languages like JAVA and Python and it is useful for us.
    • It is quite a valuable tool available at a reasonable price in the market and it is a scalable tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft Azure is highly scalable and flexible. You can quickly scale up or down additional resources and computing power.
    • You have no longer upfront investments for hardware. You only pay for the use of your computing power, storage space, or services.
    • The uptime that can be achieved and guaranteed is very important for our company. This includes the rapid maintenance for security updates that are mostly carried out by Microsoft.
    • The wide range of capabilities of services that are possible in Microsoft Azure. You can practically put or create anything in Microsoft Azure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • The software appears to be geared for a no-programming approach, which implies that making changes is more difficult.
    • The user base is small making it monotonous and difficult to come up with new methods.
    • The number of rankings is not as large as competitors.
    • The admin end is poorly designed, as they are unable to receive and respond to client feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The cost of resources is difficult to determine, technical documentation is frequently out of date, and documentation and mapping capabilities are lacking.
    • The documentation needs to be improved, and some advanced configuration options require research and experimentation.
    • Microsoft's licensing scheme is too complex for the average user, and Azure SQL syntax is too different from traditional SQL.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Easy to understand the architecture, easy of implementation and support with perfect documentation. Results driven performance in terms of latency and speed. Able to perform heavy workloads and huge transformations, also integrated SAP systems and Oracle robust deployments. But looking more in terms of AI capabilities to achieve more innovation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Moving to Azure was and still is an organizational strategy and not simply changing vendors. Our product roadmap revolved around Azure as we are in the business of humanitarian relief and Azure and Microsoft play an important part in quickly and efficiently serving all of the world. Migration and investment in Azure should be considered as an overall strategy of an organization and communicated companywide.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It provides strong support for Terraform, Ansible, and API-based management gives power users flexibility and efficiency and IBM Cloud UI is modern and relatively easy to navigate. Interfaces and workflows are consistent with on-prem Power Systems management tools. Areas to be improved - Compared to AWS or Azure, the UI could be more streamlined in how it presents all related services (e.g., networking, logging, storage) that tie into PowerVS
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    As Microsoft Azure is [doing a] really good with PaaS. The need of a market is to have [a] combo of PaaS and IaaS. While AWS is making [an] exceptionally well blend of both of them, Azure needs to work more on DevOps and Automation stuff. Apart from that, I would recommend Azure as a great platform for cloud services as scale.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It has proven to be unreliable in our production environment and services become unavailable without proper notification to system administrators
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    While there’s room for improvement, it generally works very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We were running Windows Server and Active Directory, so [Microsoft] Azure was a seamless transition. We ran into a few, if any support issues, however, the availability of Microsoft Azure's support team was more than willing and able to guide us through the process. They even proposed solutions to issues we had not even thought of!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It is economic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" platform for cloud. However, Azure PowerShell is helping close this gap. Google Cloud is the leading containerization platform, largely thanks to it building kubernetes from the ground up. Azure containerization is getting better at having the same storage/deployment options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Built to handle thousands of concurrent users, high query loads, and massive datasets especially in data-heavy industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In-memory processing, dynamic query optimization, and intelligent caching mechanisms help it scale efficiently under load. You can configure clusters of Cognos servers to distribute workload and ensure high availability, even during peak usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • We have had a return on investment of 30%.
    • There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
    • Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • For about 2 years we didn't have to do anything with our production VMs, the system ran without a hitch, which meant our engineers could focus on features rather than infrastructure.
    • DNS management was very easy in Azure, which made it easy to upgrade our cluster with zero downtime.
    • Azure Web UI was easy to work with and navigate, which meant our senior engineers and DevOps team could work with Azure without formal training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots