Backstop vs. ECOS vs. Factiva

Backstop makes planning and selecting the portfolio efficiently. There is a candid assistance in matters of resource utilization. Moreso, Backstop has a cost accounting notion, which makes the company control the expenses they make. Finally, Backstop has classical research procedures where analysis and decisions arrive after extensive assistance and evaluations.

Incentivized

I give 8 out of ten because the referral percentage is less than 10 percent, it should be 15 until 20 percent. The other are all OK, for the service and withdrawal is very good system. The program duration also good, not too long, so we can expect the return of our investment in a manner time frame

A large part of our work depends on the ability to source quality media content from a breadth of dependable sources globally. This is Factiva's bread and butter: it has a very comprehensive list of 'quality' media sources such as nationals, dailies, business journals and magazines from around the world that are easily mined for the content they hold. If you're thinking about anything other than these 'traditional' media sources then Factiva probably isn't your thing. It doesn't do social media.

Incentivized

• Storage of notes from calls and meetings.
• Tracking portfolio holding balances, transactions, and IRRs/MOICs.
• Allowing flexibility for client-defined uses.

Incentivized

• The Customer Service is well at the service.
• The Help Desk is a fast response department.
• The community at Telegram also Social Media is active every day.

• Factiva offers excellent search builders so that I am able to narrow my search to specific companies or topics very easily.
• Factiva combines a large number of credible sources into one place and allows me to search all of these sources.
• Factiva's use of timestamps helps me understand when the news was known by the market which allows me to analyze how (if at all) that particular piece of news impacted the company's stock price.
• Provides an excellent starting place for learning about a company and/or industry.

Incentivized

• Poor communication procedures
• Lack of specific OS support
• No mobile version for Backstop

Incentivized

• Referral program is not eligible for free member.
• The mining price is above USD 50.
• Referral percentage is less than 10 percent.

• The UX leaves room to be desired
• There are often repetitive entries
• The functionality can be confusing

Incentivized

Backstop support is fantastic. They always pick up the phone without a wait and are highly knowledgeable, I rarely need more than 5 minutes to fix an issue.

Incentivized

I have not used or evaluated any Backstop competitors. Freestone already used Backstop when I started.

Incentivized

Nice Hash is also a good business, but it is different from ECOS. The Nice Hash is only a broker while ECOS is a mining company, so if I may choose, I rather choose ECOS because it is easy for the investor to gain ROI. Nice Hash requires too many technical skills.

At the time, Factiva was already being used by the company I worked for - they had developed procedures specifically for using Factiva, so there wasn't really an option. I've used Lexis, Westlaw and Bloomberg exclusively for legal research, so there wasn't really an overlap with Factiva.

Incentivized

• Business ends up profiting
• The chances of investing in the wrong projects don't exist
• The analytical assistance from Backstop increases more investment plans

Incentivized

• ROI is very good, around 55 percent for 24 months.
• The higher you invest, the higher ROI you can get.
• Many people still do not believe this is a legitimate company.