Benchling’s cloud platform is used by pharmaceutical and biotech companies to analyze complex datasets, streamline research workflows, design DNA using CRISPR gene-editing technology and more.
$0
per month
Google Forms
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Google Forms is an app for creating forms and surveys, and is part of Google Apps for Work. The product focuses on ease of use; the interface is similar to a document editor, with drop down lists of options and drag and drop question re-ordering. Users can embed images and video into surveys. Users can also program the question flow with custom logic. Google sends users basic summaries of the survey results automatically, or users can export the raw survey results data and analyze it via…
N/A
Pricing
Benchling
Google Forms
Editions & Modules
Academic
$0
Professional
Contact Benchling for price
Enterprise
Contact Benchling for price
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Benchling
Google Forms
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Benchling
Google Forms
Features
Benchling
Google Forms
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Benchling
-
Ratings
Google Forms
6.6
122 Ratings
19% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
7.7113 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
6.0111 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
6.199 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Benchling
-
Ratings
Google Forms
8.0
120 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
9.0114 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
7.297 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
7.9119 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Benchling
-
Ratings
Google Forms
7.0
109 Ratings
17% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
7.0109 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Benchling
-
Ratings
Google Forms
8.4
121 Ratings
4% above category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
8.2119 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
8.1115 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.9112 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.285 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.493 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Benchling
-
Ratings
Google Forms
8.1
115 Ratings
6% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
8.0112 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
8.189 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
Benchling is especially well suited to groups or contexts where there are many users who do not have a coding background but need a seamless and structured approach to data. Benchling is particularly useful in cases where there are data flows from instruments and other devices where the data can be deposited in an automated fashion. It is likely less appropriate or useful to users who are just looking for a general data warehouse solution.
Google Forms is great for simple surveys, such as quick polls, but any logic beyond conditional pages is not supported. Google Forms is best used when the survey participants have and are permitted to use a Google Account to fill out the form; we ran into issues with hospital IT departments. I don't believe there's a better free tool out there than Google Forms, though.
Live results: When a user completes the form the results are added instantly.
Easy to create: Google Forms has a simple interface that allows for a wide range of question types. Google will even try to guess the question type based on the question (but this can be overridden).
Answers export to Google Sheets: It is easy to have each response to your form add a row to a Google Sheet, allowing for further analysis or processing.
Ability to automatically collect email addresses within a domain: If you have a form that has been shared with users in your domain, you can set it to automatically collect the users' email addresses without them needing to type it in. Makes checking whether all students have completed the form easy.
Some of the integrations can be a bit spotty so it depends on what kind of data source you are integrating
Sometimes new users are not always aware of all the various functionality that Benchling has - can do better to provide more user awareness of more complex features
Sometimes finding the output -- a Google Sheet with all responses-- is a little difficult. It's also sometimes confusing to figure out how to get back into the Google Form Survey itself.
As always, sharing among an institutional Google account and your personal Google account can be frustrating. You have to make a copy and can't share across the two different accounts very easily.
I will definitely renew my use of Google Forms because I really like the ease of use and the number of tools that Google forms provide. I also love that I can administer a test in real-time and get results in a timely manner
Overall ease of use for staff, volunteers, and adult learners, and easy to get reports and to share reports via Sheets. As a free tool, it does more than expected. Easy to change the look and brand it to your organization, or just make it more fun, depending on what you want to use it for.
In the years I've used GoogleForms I've never ran into any issues with the reliability or availability. Google is a gigantic company with essentially limitless resources which makes it very easy to trust that I will continue to be able to enjoy the same reliability I've come to know and expect from GoogleForms
One of the things that comes as a benefit of the lack to create complex logic branching and truly custom design is that there isn't lot of room to bog down the software. GoogleForms has always loaded just as fast as my internet service and device would allow it. I'm not sure about front end integrations or integrations into the form itself, as I've never explored it, but on the backend, I've never had any issues with integrations channeling from GoogleForms from the GoogleForms's end of things.
We haven't used much official support for Google Forms. However, because it is so widely used, there are a ton of articles and guides available online to help administrators of varying technical abilities to work through problems that arise. Additionally, Google provides an official support forum where there are discussions with other users as well as Google developers that can help address issues if needed.
Google Forms doesn't really require "implementation": simply log into GDrive and create a survey! You can configure settings per survey to, for example, automatically write responses to a GSheet.
Benchling was much more of a full stack solution and provide much more features that were relevant to the group. Airtable was more of a generic way to manage large amounts of data, but the complexity was still high for the types of data that would be need to be managed and there would need to be some workarounds. Overall Benchling was selected since it also had an electronic lab notebook feature which was very useful to associates in addition to its data workflows.
Although both platforms offer similar functionalities, Google Form has a personal advantage and it is the impeccable integration with the different applications of the Google suite, this allows to make use of all of them in a transparent way, which in the work environment allows to perform work efficiently and without affecting the quality of it.
GoogleForms lacks the ability for complex logic branching and the ability to truly design it in a custom manner. It's pretty obvious when you land on a GoogleForm that it is in fact a GoogleForm. This rating solely reflects the lack of flexibility which in turn makes it something that wouldn't usually be scaled. That being said, if needing to scale a simple solution, GoogleForms would be up for the job.
It had a positive ROI in terms of reducing the amount of time spent on data movement and curation by associates
It had a positive ROI in terms of increasing the number of insights from structured data
It reduced the number of data entry and analysis errors by associates which led to a positive ROI in terms of efficiency and reducing time wasted by tracking down errors in data