BigMind DR — Local Disaster Recovery for Windows BigMind DR is a local Disaster Recovery and Disk Imaging solution for Windows developed by Genie9. The platform is designed for IT professionals and regulated small offices in the legal, medical, and accounting sectors that require local Disaster Recovery capabilities without cloud dependency. Core Features BigMind DR utilizes Block-Level Imaging technology to capture system…
$59.99
one-time fee per user
OpenText Availability
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite acquired Double-Take, a data replication and disaster recovery option, in early 2017. The technology now powers OpenText Availability, the high availability and data replication product.
N/A
Pricing
BigMind DR
OpenText Availability
Editions & Modules
BigMind DR Plus
$59.99
one-time fee per user
BigMind DR Pro
$119
one-time fee per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BigMind DR
OpenText Availability
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
BigMind DR uses per-account pricing, not per-endpoint or per-device. The Plus plan covers 10 users and up to 20 devices for a one-time $59 lifetime payment. The Pro plan covers 15 users and up to 45 devices for $119 lifetime. Unlike competitors such as Acronis and Veeam which charge $50–$130 per workstation annually, BigMind DR offers a single lifetime price with no recurring fees and no cloud storage costs — the customer brings their own storage device.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BigMind DR
OpenText Availability
Considered Both Products
BigMind DR
No answer on this topic
OpenText Availability
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose OpenText Availability
Carbonite Availability does an outstanding job competing against competitors like Druva and Veeam. It provides useful tools that every organization needs in this day and age. Companies will rely on Carbonite Availability more and more as IT organizations become ever more …
Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it.
Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual …
It's a cost effective solution for our smaller clients. However since doubletake is quite different from RecoverPoint. I can't do an apples to apples comparison.
I believe it would work well with continuous replication in a DR scenario with no time limits and having the ability to fail back is a bonus, but in a one off move the decision to restrict the time it can sync for has proven to be an issue for us.
License management is poor and the online system is very restrictive, We are using a one time "Move" product that has a fixed life ... but sometimes in a small team other high priority tasks come along.
We lost all access to all licenses in the portal and all support because we hadn't used them in ninety days. Very poor service. We did get access back eventually but it took a lot of "bargaining".
Failover isn't always as smooth as it could be. VMDKs don't release properly and the move fails and has to be done manually. Not hard just frustrating. VMWare to VMWare.
Cabonite Availability is a very practical and useful tool that can help any business weather any type of IT disaster. The ease and quickness of restoring data helps us provide as seamless an experience as possible. Many times our customers will never know there was an outage. This brings confidence in our brand and improves our organization's standing and reputation.
Once through to support it is very good and they have assisted us through a number of issues. I don't always think that they provide a solution, more a workaround, but in a move situation where each copy is moving once, that isn't an issue. I'd be more concerned if we were using it to manage a DR scenario.
Zerto is a very nice tool when performing virtual to virtual replication. If you were to add a physical server in the mix, it would not be able to handle that server or the data on it. Veeam is a way is similar to Zerto where it only has the ability to handle virtual to virtual replication. The big difference is that it's not continuous replication. It uses a snapshot technology to grab the changes from the last snapshot and replicate that over.