BQE CORE vs. HaloPSA
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BQE CORE | Score8.8 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | BQE CORE is a business management solution built specifically for professional service firms. BQE CORE is a combination of a billing assistant, project management, and accounting solution. CORE is designed to do the hard work of delivering actionable insights directly to the user's dashboards or inbox. BQE CORE replaces the products Engineeroffice, Archioffice, and BillQuick; the functionality of these applications is now found in BQE CORE. | N/A |
HaloPSA | Score8.1 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | HaloPSA is a solution designed for MSP's and service providers. With HaloPSA out-of-the-box functionality, the solution aims to provide businesses a Cloud platform that enables users to modernise customer experience and automate service. An integrated PSA platform, it includes features such as time-tracking and billing, advanced reporting, asset management, remote access, integrations, and automation tools. Aligned to the user's requirements and boasting an intuitive UI, users… | $35 per month per user |
| BQE CORE | HaloPSA | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 15% discount for all charities, educational institutions and non-profit organisations. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| BQE CORE | HaloPSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 144 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 106 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 150 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 70 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
82% Implementation went as expected 81 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| BQE CORE | HaloPSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Autotask PSA Score7.7 out of 10 | Autotask PSA Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Workday Professional Services Automation Score8.2 out of 10 | Workday Professional Services Automation Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Planview AdaptiveWork Score8.8 out of 10 | Planview AdaptiveWork Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| BQE CORE | HaloPSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.6 | - |
| Availability | 8.2 | - |
| Performance | 7.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.4 | - |
| Online Training | 6.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 2.3 | - |
| Ease of integration | 4.5 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.2 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.2 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.2 | - |
| BQE CORE | HaloPSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | BQE CORE Screenshots | HaloPSA Screenshots |













