Brightcove Video is a video hosting and publishing solution. The company also provides a cloud media processing product called Zencoder.
N/A
BuzzCast
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
BuzzCast supports flagship events for clients such as The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Uber, Fiserv, Carnival, The World Travel and Tourism Council, and AES. Crafted specifically to handle the needs of top tier production companies and their enterprise clients, BuzzCast is focused on three core pillars: Scalability Security Service Built from the ground up on the newest AWS Serverless…
N/A
Pricing
Brightcove
BuzzCast
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brightcove
BuzzCast
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
BuzzCast offers an annual subscription based pricing model. Calculations are based on number of attendees, numbers of event and rehearsal days, streaming usage and level of production support you require. Our suite of leading edge features are yours to utilize for the duration of the annual license.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Brightcove
BuzzCast
Considered Both Products
Brightcove
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Brightcove
YouTube, Vimeo, they are not on list, but still Brightcove Video is the best so far and we have been using it for a long time.
Brightcove is a more affordable option and has a lot of features that are excellent. The only downside is the scalability of the tool, especially as a sales enablement function.
Well, we are on the new age of web and that means we have to adapt and be upgraded every day. It requires us to be modern and this is the main difference between them. Being customizable feels very good. It's fun and no price for trying. And it completely deserves a try.
I'm in the process of evaluating other products now as rates for Brightcove were high and I'm not able to find prices immediately when I want to implement it on my projects. I have started to look at Ooyala and DaCast.
I was not part of the decision making for this product, but I heard the decision was based on its ease of use, quick implementation and low maintenance.
Marketing department favors it because EVERYONE uses YouTube. Overall, YouTube offers decent features and functionality. But Brightcove offers the ability to brand and style players, and control what our users see (and so much more) and YouTube does not. For instance, on …
Brightcove is more user-friendly and allows for more opportunity when publishing content.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Brightcove
Brightcove is the only product I have used so unfortunately I cannot compare and contrast to competitors. I still stand very impressed with Brightcove during the time I used it and would reccommend it for anyone.
The decision to migrate from Kyte to Brightcove was made before I came on-board. However, I've worked with both systems and I am extremely happy we went with Brightcove. The user-friendly interface and mobile app. made it a great choice for event and sponsorship streaming.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Brightcove
I've used Ooyala and I do like Brightcove over Ooyala as I feel their read APIs are easier to work with. However, to be fair, I've never used Ooyala's write APIs, which may or may not be better.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Brightcove
Question not applicable
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Brightcove
I have not used other products that I would consider similar to Brightcove.
We looked hard at Kaltura and thought it was a good product. We were attracted to being able to download a version of the video from the player. In test we had technical questions concerning captions and languages and could not get adequate answers with many attempts. Over time …
BuzzCast
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose BuzzCast
BuzzCast was the first I used but it nailed every task I threw at it. I am completely satisfied.
The BuzzCast interface is more polished and customizable. We also like the amount of attention we get from the team as BuzzCast (at least for now) is a smaller company that still has some human involvement in every event that happens on the platform.
BuzzCast platform has the most amount of features that our events require (public chat/private chat, breakouts, auto-scrolling agenda). The entire platform is built and designed so that it's intuitive for our viewers and they are shown exactly how to operate the platform in …
BuzzCast was definitely the most high touch and the attention we received right from the intro call was impressive. We always felt like the only client (despite knowing there are MANY other events happening simultaneously) and the team was incredibly responsive and proactive …
It works very nicely for our company site because it can easily and seamlessly embed into the site and email HTML pages. It also has picture in picture, sharing, closed captioning (CC) as basic functions. It will also show the time of the video. Because these are short-term-use videos or might get updated frequently and also are just targeting a specific audience, being able to hide or not able to show the number of views or date published (unlike YouTube) actually helps us.
BuzzCast is great for large, complex online events - especially during the pandemic when it's been hard or impossible to gather folks in person. If you only need a smaller group of 5 or 10 people, BuzzCast is probably overkill. Once you have lots of people / multiple sessions, or want to capture and save presentations for later, you'll want to start looking at BuzzCast.
Ability to easily output a JSON response for requested video data. This makes it easy to work with Brightcove as partner.
The read APIs are very flexible and can the output can be easily customized using cgi args. This provides great customization of the output and sorting and filtering mechanisms to find the videos you're looking for.
The ability to add captions to videos is good, especially with the regulations requiring video captioning. DFXP support works great as long as the player is given the exact XML format it is looking for.
It took quite some time to upload and organize our video library. The amount of time it would require to relocate all this information outweighs any negative aspect I personally have with the experience. They have been pretty good to work with and from speaking with my Brightcove rep, I know some of the issues I have listed are currently being addressed and tested for future releases.
We are notified often of downtime, and I have not heard from a support rep for over a year. It really makes it hard to learn what new things are coming out and how we can take our video to the next level when there is no contact from the team on a regular cadence.
Marketing department favors it because EVERYONE uses YouTube. Overall, YouTube offers decent features and functionality. But Brightcove offers the ability to brand and style players, and control what our users see (and so much more) and YouTube does not. For instance, on YouTube, users are presented with other videos (which could contain competitor videos).
BuzzCast platform has the most amount of features that our events require (public chat/private chat, breakouts, auto-scrolling agenda). The entire platform is built and designed so that it's intuitive for our viewers and they are shown exactly how to operate the platform in under a minute. The quality of the stream is superior. The BuzzCast team is great to work with and are true partners who are all solution-oriented.