BugTracker.net vs. Micro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued) vs. SpiraTeam

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Micro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)
Score 3.2 out of 10
N/A
Micro Focus Agile Manager is an application lifecycle management option acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise. It has reached End of Life. Users are encouraged to migrate to Micro Focus ALM Octane.N/A
SpiraTeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Inflectra SpiraTeam is a project Management solution built around capabilities such as bug tracking, quality assurance, and collaboration.
$171.99
per month (3 concurrent users)
Pricing
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Cloud
$57.33
per month per concurrent user
Download
$558.00
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing. Billed by concurrent users (3 minimum). Discount available for larger amount of concurrent users.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Best Alternatives
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugTracker.netMicro Focus Agile Manager (Discontinued)SpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project?
Read full review
Discontinued Products
One scenario I believe HP Agile Manager is well suited is for a team of 5 or more developers who are releasing new features or addressing defects. Another scenario where it is beneficial is for teams of QA Automation engineers, where again, the objectives are clear. A scenario where I believe it would be less appropriate is for operations-type teams where objectives are not always clear cut, and the roles must be more reactive.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
*Well Suited for Organizations having [fewer] numbers of Tech People that [means] it's easy to operate and maintain. Currently find no scenarios for its less [appropriateness]
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base.
  • Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles.
  • Customization of fields on a project level.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Agile manager is particularly good for planning out sprints in an Agile methodology
  • The Task Board in AGM gives clear swim-lanes to indicate progress/status, or to gauge that of another team member.
  • The Dash Board gives visibility to team members capacity and the overall team burn down.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Very easy to use.
  • Entire collaboration suite for the software development lifecycle.
  • Configurable to particular project needs.
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • User interface for client-facing feedback
  • Content and design updates tracking
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Removing stories from a Sprint results in them being difficult to find later.
  • Editing story details is slightly cumbersome.
  • It's somewhat unclear how capacity fills up for stories split from prior sprints.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Some more sample reports or allow for a cross reference reporting engine
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
No answers on this topic
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
The usability is excellent in most cases but lacks some intuitive functions, such as a copy to the clipboard for selected items. In fact, in an older version, a COPY button copied all selected records rather than putting it on the clipboard. The button has been renamed recently to CLONE, otherwise, my rating would be lower.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
HP Agile Manager is beefy enough to work for bigger teams. In this way it matches closely to what is offered with Rally. One area it comes up short when compared to Rally is the apparent lack of a test management capability, where requirements can be entered then mapped to test cases. Agile Manager has some of the agile feel offered by Trello and Waffle but the added functionality that makes it more valuable for bigger teams.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
None Other Used
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • It has allowed us to plan our Sprint work more effectively
  • It has made it more clear how to accurately estimate certain problems
  • It has given clarity over time as to the skill and work speed of team members
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Better historical information about what happend in past releases, deeper integration with the whole software development life cycle.
Read full review
ScreenShots