SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.
N/A
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Built on the ServiceNow Now Platform, the IT Service Management bundle provides an agent workspace with knowledge management, and modules supporting issue tracking and problem resolution, change, release and configuration management.
N/A
Pricing
SAI360
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
ITSM Standard
Custom Quote
ITSM Pro
Custom Quote
ITSM Enterprise
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAI360
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
ITSM Pro and ITSM Enterprise also are available with optional "Plus" add-ons. These include AI Agents, an AI Agent Studio, and other features that augment the capabilities of the platform using AI Virtual Agents to automate tasks.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAI360
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Features
SAI360
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
7.7
5 Ratings
2% above category average
ServiceNow IT Service Management
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk management
7.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
GRC policy management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident management
7.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
-
Ratings
ServiceNow IT Service Management
8.2
75 Ratings
1% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
9.074 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
8.157 Ratings
Service restoration
00 Ratings
8.061 Ratings
Self-service tools
00 Ratings
7.972 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
8.570 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
7.866 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
00 Ratings
8.169 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
-
Ratings
ServiceNow IT Service Management
8.1
67 Ratings
2% below category average
Configuration mangement
00 Ratings
8.066 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
00 Ratings
7.865 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
00 Ratings
8.457 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
It is well suited for medium to large companies that require a tool to allow users to create IT requests, have a self-service portal, track the completion of such requests and have access to KPIs to understand the satisaction level of the requestors. It is not the best tool if you want to have a heavy personalized IT Service Management tool to cater to all your needs or when you want to have an easy way to search for past tickets using specific keywords.
Finding requests that I opened and have since been completed by the assigned group/individual is very difficult to accomplish unless I've written down the request numbers somewhere.
Requests that I opened and are subsequently closed, often continue to appear in the list of "My Open Requests" giving the appearance that they were not completed when in fact they were.
It may exist, but if it does I haven't found it yet, which makes it less than intuitive, but I would like to see the ability to recall a request in ServiceNow.
I believe our firewall rule change request for is a custom form, but it has a serious drawback. If I submit such a request and need to make a correction to it before it is approved, there isn't anyway for me to do so. The request has to first be rejected with the creation of a sub-task in order to edit it before it is resubmitted for approval.
To be completely honest setting up a new ticketing system can be a pain in the ass. Once you have it setup and customized the way you want it, you don't want to switch unless you're unhappy with the product. Unless future releases and updates really muck the system up, I wouldn't change.
It has helped us a lot, and after some training and getting to know the product, we are quite comfortable with it and feel much more capable of understanding what's going on in our IT environment. The only reason it doesn't get a perfect score from me is that there is a learning curve for both end users and IT admins using ServiceNow. Once you customize the UI and remove unnecessary fields. You are left with a very clean product that does what it needs to and does it well.
I would give it this rating because we have had no major issues with the support for ServiceNow after we implemented it at our organization. They seem to respond promptly and efficiently if we ever do need to open a support case with them about an issue we are having.
To type in what should be a text box, you have to click an empty cell, a tiny text box pop up opens with a check box and an X. You the. Type in the text box and have to click the check mark. If you have a bunch of fields to fill out, doing this is very annoying. Absolutely know thought went in to this. I'm sure somebody in marketing thought it was a good idea. It wasn't.
Without exception, every client I have worked with has been very happy with their resulting product. While this is partly due to my work, I must point out that the platform is the winning decision, not the implementer.
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
We used to use Jira to handle service tickets but it's way too robust for something this straightforward. Due to the nature of Jira, you needed to already have a lot of documentation and knowledge about who should be assigned the ticket, so the lift of creating a ticket was time consuming.
We don't currently have a CMDB, so we are leveraging ServiceNow to build one using their ITSM and ITOM tools. This is a huge gap for us as a company and it will be a big win once this is in place.
The core help desk functions are comparable to most other tools on the market, but SN does a great job of integrating that data with other modules like Problem, Change and Event Management to provide a truly integrated solution.
The tool is expensive, so you will need to try to do as much as you can with the platform. We currently use other systems for HAM and SAM but will be including these in our ServiceNow instance in the future to help maximize our ROI.