CareerBuilder Applicant Tracking vs. JobScore

Great for a small company that doesn't have a lot of resources. Allows manager and HR to be on the same location to review resumes and assess them. Alerts can be sent to managers all in the system. I really like the product so don't know where it would be less appropriated if you really needed a ATS

Incentivized

Companies that have not used an ATS before and instead rely on google docs and spreadsheets often fear moving to HR software out of misplaced concern over change management. Jobscore is built with such elegance that the training and education ramp is slim to none.

• Easy user face.
• Easy to learn.
• Easy to work with, always helpful.

Incentivized

• Resume grading
• Post interview feedback and notes
• Connect applicant resources (LinkedIn, resume, applicant questions)

• Search tool has limits. You can key word search, and that is about it.
• When reading a resume for one job respondent in a requisition, I would like to stay in that same viewing mode when jumping to the next candidate with less clicks!

Incentivized

• Improved mobile experience

Didn't always get good resumes from Monster. CareerBuilder Applicant Tracking allowed us to get resumes and track all in one place which was very helpful for the project we were working on at the time. Resumes were good as well as system itself. The managers all like it as well which is a big help when you want their buy in to a product to use.

Incentivized

Jobscore wins on ease of use and therefore speed to value. Training lift is negligible as most users can get up to speed in a self-guided manner

• Negative-ROI.
• Positive - brand awareness
• Positive - templates

Incentivized

• Less time evaluating individual candidates
• Better interview process