CARL Source vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CARL Source	Score10 out of 10	N/A	CARL Software is a French CMMS software company for over 40 years. CARL Source is a CMMS/EAM solution designed to meet the needs of companies in all sectors. CARL Source optimizes maintenance management, reduces downtime and improves the productivity of technical teams. CARL Software positions itself as ready for Industry 5.0 and Maintenance 5.0 by integrating AI-based solutions. CARL Software states they have been working for over 10 years on artificial intelligence-based…	N/A
Hippo CMMS	Score2 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…	$35 per month per user

Hippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	CARL Source	Hippo CMMS
Considered Both Products	CARL Software No answer on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) No answer on this topic
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	88% Would buy again 7 Answers
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers

User Ratings
	CARL Source	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	2.0 (8 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	8.6 (4 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CARL Source	Hippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution. Incentivized Mark Paul Assistant Director of Facilities Read full review
Pros	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) Simple to use Work requester. Great customer service and support. Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Cons	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need. I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time. Labor tracking and reporting could be improved. Incentivized Verified User Read full review
Support Rating	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others. Incentivized Tim Heath Plant Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task. Melvin Larsen Hospital Tech Specialist Read full review
Return on Investment	CARL Software No answers on this topic	Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ) Allows tracking something that we did not have before Decision making is now with hard data Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance. Incentivized Dusty Reeves Operations Manager Read full review
ScreenShots	CARL Source Screenshots	Hippo CMMS Screenshots

CARL Source vs. Hippo CMMS

CARL Source

Hippo CMMS

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

CARL Source Screenshots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots