CAS090704 vs. MasterControl Quality Excellence

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CAS090704
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$9.95
one-time fee
MasterControl Quality Excellence
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
MasterControl Quality Excellence is a Quality Management System (QMS) for the life sciences. It enables life-sciences companies to enable flexible quality event management, simplified document management, and automated training management that work together to close the loop on quality.N/A
Pricing
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Editions & Modules
Basic
$9.95
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Considered Both Products
CAS090704

No answer on this topic

MasterControl Quality Excellence
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
Microsoft Teams is pretty easy to navigate and pick up if you are a new user. The problem with the platform is that you don't always know if you are reviewing the latest revision of a document. This is where MasterControl Quality Excellence does a much better job of serving …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quality Excellence requires more of a learning curve. However, it is a more respected eQMS standard in the industry.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
Advanced quality event management was also easy to implement. It was easier to customize your own work flow and also to be able to customize the fields within the form based on feedback provided by users and it meets company need. Not sure if Veeva or other system have …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
Industry leading offering. others are good, but this is the standard for a reason
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
I have only used MasterControl Quality Excellence as a system for document control. All previous experience has been through documents directly and getting signatures manually. MasterControl Quality Excellence has made remote work much more accessible especially when office …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
Veeva Vault Quality, Qualio, Greenlight Guru and PTC Windchill
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quality Excellence is twice the cost, but the implementation of AQEM makes it fit-for-purpose.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
All in one approach
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quality Excellence is the best value as it does not carry the high price tag that Veeva and provides scalable solutions for small, medium and very large enterprise organizations. MasterControl Quality Excellence is focused on ensuring their pipeline can support …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl’s Quality Excellence stacks up very well with other systems due to it complete suite of MC products such as, Logbooks, Production Records (Mx), and Asset Management (Ax). Other systems may have one, or more, of these modules, but none were able to package them …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
We are still evaluating and the outcome will be based on a list of user requirements documented for various need across our organization.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MS provides configuration flexibility rather than requiring coding for business operations.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quakity Excellence was selected due to the need for a new medical device application and was best suited to meet the needs of the rest of the business that focuses on food and beverage. It was the Manufacturing Excellence module that set it apart and was a key …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl seems to be better suited for life sciences industries, as the out of the box configuration is more strict. In terms of end users, the MasterControl layout looks more user friendly when compared to others.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
My company had MasterControl when I joined, and I have not used any other DMS/TMS
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quality Excellence was largely selected due to the familiarity the incoming quality manager had with the software. It would have been difficult to meet the targeted certification date if the administrator of the software had no experience using it.
MasterControl …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControls' user interface is more visually appealing than others I have seen. It enhances the user experience of utilizing MasterControl Quality Excellence and provides clearer visual cues when certain items require attention. Other systems I have used rely on knowing …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl offered a significantly easier to use interface, and a much easier to customize backend than TrackWise. While both systems are targeted at the same tasks, Trackwise felt clumsy where MasterControl felt polished. Tracking documentation, especially the ability to …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
It is a modern saas platform with a well-defined development and continuous improvement plan. The manufacturer's investments in research and development convinced us to choose their solution.
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
The products we evaluated were considered as potential replacements for MasterControl Quality Excellence. At this time, we continue using MasterControl Quality Excellence primarily due to the significant volume of data in our system and the operational impact of a platform …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl makes it easier to have control over what people can see and download. MasterControl also hides archived documents from users' view, so they aren't using an out-of-date copy while working in the labs. The training module is also enhanced by the attachment section, …
Chose MasterControl Quality Excellence
MasterControl Quality Excellence is better than Veeva Vault because it's easier to use, faster to implement, and built specifically for highly regulated industries. It offers more flexibility, better integration with manufacturing systems, and strong tools for audits and …
Best Alternatives
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CAS090704MasterControl Quality Excellence
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The MasterControl Quality Excellence suite is well suited for the life sciences and biotechnology as well as manufacturing companies that could benefit from the regulatory compliance that this suite of products offer. This product is highly recommended for industries that want to reduce paper overhead and digitally transform their QMS into a singular location
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Organization - the layout and idea behind how the website is displayed and functions.
  • Compliance - ensuring our documents are kept up to date and accurate.
  • Quality - by having a platform with all documents with all standards set out at once, quality standards are easily accessed.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • There is no trigger if there is a duplicate document in the system. Since each InfoCard has its document number, unless used simultaneously with someone else, there is no trigger for duplicate documents.
  • When searching and looking at all the documents on the system, it would be nice to have a time column showing when it was released. All I am currently going off of is taking the document number and the highest, but that also takes time.
  • You can't get rid of a subtype if you have data associated with it. So if you enter documents a certain way and your team decides to change how, things will be more efficient, etc. You can't delete that subtype until you remove all data from the system, even if you don't need some. It's a big task if you have been using it for a long time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
would rate MasterControl Quality Excellence a 7 out of 10 because, while it offers strong compliance tools, centralized document control, and effective audit readiness features, there are still areas that could be improved to enhance the overall user experience. The platform can sometimes feel complex and unintuitive, especially for new users, and customizing workflows to fit specific organizational needs can be challenging. Additionally, integration with other enterprise systems isn't always seamless, which can slow down processes. Despite these drawbacks, the system remains a reliable and valuable tool for maintaining quality and regulatory compliance.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Some tasks require the users and SysAdmin to access multiple modules at a time. For example: to create a training course and an exam for a document in the system, the user needs to finish creating the document in the doc module, then go to the training module to create a course and an exam separately. Ideally, from the document page we should be able to access the training course, which could have some fields auto-populated. And from there, also create and link an exam, all without leaving the document page.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
they are good about keeping it running
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
some reports take time to filter and to get them to give the correct information. This is usually because of inputs.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The Technical Support team has grown exponentially over the last couple years. Some front line support staff are new to the system and so know less than the clients do. Back line staff are more seasoned and provide immediate assistance to the front line staff. They have an extensive knowledge bank to assist them as well as client access to most KB articles. Annual user group conference gives us chance to meet the support staff an also to resolve any outstanding issues. Any critical vendor notices are emailed immediately when found and a patch offered at the same time. These are rare, but quickly resolved.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I rated the MasterControl in-person training a 10 because it was clear, practical, and well-paced. The trainer explained concepts thoroughly and answered questions effectively. I appreciated the hands-on walkthroughs, which made it easier to understand how to apply the system in real scenarios. Overall, it was a valuable learning experience that boosted my confidence in using MasterControl.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
transparent and immediate when the documents are updated. Easy to check on training and customizable to the company's expectations. Allows easy exam creation with GXP assist and the correlation between job codes and courses has proven reliable. What i would advocate is that you see who has trained on the course in the Course Infocard, to the document infocard
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The implementation of MasterControl Quality Excellence was largely successful, earning an 8 out of 10. The project was well-structured, and the implementation team provided solid guidance throughout the process. Key milestones were met on time, and the system was configured to meet most of our core requirements. One of the most valuable aspects was the hands-on training and support during go-live, which helped ensure user adoption. However, there were some challenges around data migration and aligning the system’s capabilities with our existing workflows, which required more time and effort than anticipated. Overall, the experience was positive, and the lessons learned have positioned us well for future system enhancements.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
MasterControls' user interface is more visually appealing than others I have seen. It enhances the user experience of utilizing MasterControl Quality Excellence and provides clearer visual cues when certain items require attention. Other systems I have used rely on knowing what will execute the functions without much assistance. MasterControl provides additional cues when hovering over items that require entry to provide additional context.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
there are many updates
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Paper-based change control processes that previously took weeks have been reduced to days, significantly improving operational efficiency and document turnaround times.
  • Custom-developed forms within MasterControl Quality Excellence have enabled data validation at the point of entry, which has substantially reduced input errors and deviations. This benefit, however, is dependent on internal developer resources, as the platform functions primarily as a host.
  • After 15 years of use, poor initial implementation and software limitations created lasting technical debt. System migrations to resolve these issues is still ongoing after years of manual efforts, and unmet functionality continues to impact productivity, forcing additional software purchases to address gaps.
Read full review
ScreenShots