Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score4.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
3.09 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
23% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info