Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Plone
Score10 out of 10
N/A
Plone is a free and open source content management system built on top of the Zope application server. Plone can be used for any kind of website, including blogs, internet sites, webshops, and internal websites.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Plone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Plone
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Plone
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
19% above category average
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
25% above category average
API
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Plone
9.4
6 Ratings
18% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Plone
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
The larger your organization, the more appropriate Plone will be. This is not to say that Plone is a worse choice for small websites, only that the minimum investment for a Plone site is certainly higher than for other platforms. If you already use Plone for your site and are looking for a redesign or an overhaul, I would only advise switching to a different platform such as WordPress or Drupal if your organization is downsizing. For any other situation, Plone is the natural choice for your growth.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Plone is a folder-based system, organising content in a similar way desktop-users are doing for the last two decades. No need to teach non-tech customers some relational-database like paradigm for content management.
Plone is secure. It is the most secure CMS you can get your hands on.
Plone is flexible, and makes fast development easy.
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Not everything is configurable or editable by Plone, and when you need to adjust or add custom pieces in, you need to deal with Zope. Zope has an ugly, confusing and difficult UI and structure as a backend.
Using 3rd party products is difficult to do - there are a few different ways to get them installed, all of which take a bit of luck to get right.
Building custom products for Plone is not fun. You've got to deal with an archaic framework to tie in that is not well documented (there is documentation about many things, but not great documentation and there are a lot of holes in the documentation).
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Compared to the amount of Plone sites, users and customizations we have in our organization, the amount of support requests and training needed is really small.
The new user interface in Plone 6 is even better, it is super fast, has lots of different blocks for enhancing the page, has flexible layout system and is easy to extend with more features.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
Our Plone sites are very robust. We have critical systems on Plone and we have been running sites on Plone for over 20 years with very little unexpected downtime.
Plone is very intensive in its operations, and if not configured well it can be slow. However it is designed and built with speed in mind and with proper use of coding, templates and caching can perform extremely well under high loads. It is capable of scaling to very high load availability environments with no specific coding requirements.
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Drupal: Plone is cheaper, so with Drupal is more complex to reach the required ROI. However, Drupal has a lower learning curve WordPress: For our necessities it has a more expensive learning curve than plone. Joomla, is easier to use. However, it have some issues on security and web content where Plone is much better
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The impact Plone has had at the University of Oshkosh is as follows: this software allows student workers to learn about IT departments and CMS's in a user-friendly way. It gives many students great jobs that look great on their resumes.
Since there are great training manuals for Plone, there is increased employee efficient in the workplace. Training doesn't take long, and if there's ever a question, the Plone manual is a great tool to refer to.
If an employee using Plone quits, its easy to find someone to replace them with quick training and great resources.