ChatGPT vs. Perplexity

I’d definitely recommend ChatGPT to anyone as a great introduction to generative AI and as a starting point in research, writing, brainstorming, or general questions or judgement questions. It can be a great tool to use when you don’t necessarily need an accurate answer. For example, I wouldn’t let it calculate my taxes, but I’d use it to ask some general tax questions, then ask for sources and then verify by checking those sources. I also love ChatGPT for writing and questions - it’s great for emails, creating templates and outlines, and for generating spreadsheet formulas.

Incentivized

Perplexity is helpful when you want auto-code generation for day-to-day problem scenarios such as Powershell script to accomplish a task, Code to invoke a REST API, Class generation from JSON/XML data, etc. It is also helpful when you want to correct or optimize code that you have self-written. Perplexity might not be best suited for scenarios when you need 100% accuracy without your self-verification of correctness.

Incentivized

• Saves time by generating content about a specific topic very quickly
• Allows us to quickly learn information online (from various sources or even a single lengthy article) into more summed up digestible paragraphs (and even bullet points)
• Can autogenerate content on a vast amount of topics

Incentivized

• Research the company that my prospects work for.
• Research background on my prospects.
• Combine those two and come up with about one page on how to approach them based on the space (persona) I created.

Incentivized

• Wish it had support for better slides generation. Sometimes we found ourselves using chatgpt to outline a presentation but build it ourselves or use a tool like Gamma
• Maybe a chepear $10 plan. In some countries the US dollar can be expensive and $20 goes a long way.
• I wish you could make projects with more files. They limit it. Or make the limit based on the content, not the number of files per se

Incentivized

• Image generation is not upto mark
• Data analysis for excel is way off
• Getting insights on data not available online is hard
• Need to embed like copilot in assisting day to day activities

Incentivized

ChatGPT is a powerful assistant. As long as you understand what it is you're looking for in its results, it can save you a lot of time due to its ability to do the heavy lifting for you. This frees your time up to enable you to concentrate on other tasks.

Incentivized

The product is easy to use, simple, and powerful. I like the ability to make the product more of a pro-tool, whilst also keeping it simple if you're not necessarily trying to go deep with additional changes. The tool is easy to use for beginners of AI, but can also be used by pros with API access, custom GPT mode, or codex

Incentivized

It's great, but doesn't necessarily feel like it adds enough value over using CoPilot, ChatGPT, or whichever generative AI tool your business already uses. Time will tell if this model continues to be developed, and whether it remains competitive with the other big models out in the industry, and innovating features and integrating more use cases fast.

Incentivized

Their responses are always professional , although they delay sometimes

Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled writer than ChatGPT. Some aspects of Claude's user experience are better than ChatGPT's. Its image, audio, and video translations are better than ChatGPT's.

Incentivized

I think they both do well. I use ChatGPT for some pre-created GPTs. So because I use them for different functions, it's hard to compare them head-to-head. I also use an Abacus, which I like a lot. Overall, they are all good, but I have different use cases for each one.

Incentivized

• Positive: Speeds up research time (freeing up 1-2 hours per day)
• Positive: Provides complex content in digestible formats
• Positive: Allows us to get super granular, including asking it coding questions
• Positive: Allows us to ask learning-style questions where it can further break something down for us

Incentivized

• Increases efficiency
• Saves costs (e.g. for creation of creative content)
• Frees up time that can be used for other productive actions

Incentivized