Cisco Catalyst Assurance vs. IBM SevOne
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Catalyst Assurance | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Replacing the former Cisco DNA Analytics and Assurance, Cisco Catalyst Assurance is an advanced network analytics solution that leverages machine learning and AI to provide insights, proactive issue detection, and accelerated troubleshooting for enterprise networks. It collects streaming telemetry and contextual data from endpoints, devices, users, and applications across the network to create a personalized baseline of normal network behavior. This enables AI-driven anomaly detection, root… | N/A |
IBM SevOne | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM SevOne’s app-centric, hybrid network observability empowers NetOps teams with ML-driven insights, enabling proactive issue prevention and resolution. With a single source of truth for network performance, it delivers visibility to optimize operations and support agility in complex, multi-cloud environments. | N/A |
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | IBM® SevOne® uses Managed Device (MD) and Managed Client Device (MCD) as pricing metrics. These can be mapped to managed devices for physical, virtualized and containerized functions in the managed environment. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
80% Would buy again 4 Answers | 100% Would buy again 15 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 15 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
40% Implementation went as expected 2 Answers | 91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | |
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 7.7 |
| Usability | 7.9 | - |
| Cisco Catalyst Assurance | IBM SevOne | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM SevOne Screenshots |






