Cisco Secure Connect vs. Zscaler Internet Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Connect
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure Connect is a SASE solution that converges Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) and Security Service Edge (SSE) to enable operational consistency across premises to the cloud.N/A
Zscaler Internet Access
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Internet Access™ (ZIA) is a secure web gateway (SWG), delivering cloud native cyberthreat protection and zero trust access to the internet and SaaS apps.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Considered Both Products
Cisco Secure Connect
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
I have used Meraki a lot, so I would access point cameras, pretty much everything in Meraki.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
It provides better integration of networking and security as well. Cisco provides better connections and better handling of networks which can be re used. Cisco provides better user experience and stability and it provides scalability for large MNC, enterprises.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Cisco Secure Connect allows for secure connections to critical systems with a better performance while maintaining security for users and business processes, maintaining the company policies and security posture for improved end user experience without impact on the services. …
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Cisco Secure Connenect can enables remote users to access private applications from anywhere through the Cisco Secure Connect fabric using a Cisco Secure Client
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Cisco Secure Connect Ease of use and management
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
We evaluated Zscaler and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access alongside Cisco Secure Connect. Zscaler offered strong security but lacked the centralized network management features we needed. Prisma Access had robust integration and customization, yet was more complex to deploy and …
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Had has UI and more secured compared to other competitor product and Cisco secure has more functionally like umbrella, ise, many more
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
it's more straighforward. There is a clear support team. The functionnality are 95% the same, but the GUI is more for developper than overall users.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Microsoft Teams Rooms
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
I have only used Cisco Secure Connect.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Cisco secure connect offered multiple usage like VPN, Firewalls and DNS security. Considering future forecast we chosen CSC.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
I looked at using Fortigate firewalls but Meraki MX and Cisco Secure Connect were much easier and integrated better for a small business with one IT person. Since it's an out of the box solution that is what made me pick Cisco Secure Connect over any others.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Cisco Secure Connect is easier to configure than other products in the marketplace.
Chose Cisco Secure Connect
Seemed easy to leave a review on something I use everyday
Zscaler Internet Access
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is a great compliment as they all work together with seamless integration.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Cortex Xpanse by Palo Alto Networks
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
ZCC being one implementation with Zscaler Internet Access and ZPA being on the same app, that made the decision easier, also with the partnership that Zscaler brought to the table.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Netskope Cloud Firewall
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
I prefer it by far, it works well with integrations, it is built to grow with us, and support us.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Internet Access is more granular.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Free pov was huge. We didn't get that with Cato.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Deception
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
Scalability and visibility.
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
The overall user community and scope of supportability outweighed the others on our short list. Netskope was a close second, but the risk, though small, was greater than that of bringing Zscaler aboard. We were looking for a mature, well-supported, highly functional, and …
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
CrowdStrike Falcon
Chose Zscaler Internet Access
We have differences, but we are happy with Zscaler.
Features
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Connect
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
5.0
Ratings
56% below category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Connect
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
10.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Connect
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.4
Ratings
9% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Connect
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.8
Ratings
3% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure ConnectZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Enterprise with Hybrid Workers or remote workers where most of the resources are in cloud. Branches spread around the worlds with private DCs. Enterprise with mpls or sd-wan connection, the Cisco Secure Connect technology is a further technology upgrade from SD-WAN. Central management of l3/l4 policies, DNS filtering and Web Filtering based on the identity.
Read full review
It has been pretty great in our deployment; the ability to send specific messages to users, or to isolate with a banner, has given us more control without blunt "this was blocked for this reason" landing pages. We have a lot of YouTube use, and it's difficult to police the legitimate use from personal use. Because of this, the quotas have been an effective way to achieve traffic goals without getting in users' way.
Read full review
Pros
  • I think it integrates very well with Meraki, and that's the best thing I like about this product. Meraki is all about simplicity, and when a customer has the same user interface to get their network and security experience just right out of the Meraki dashboard, it really works. Very great. For example, if you want to secure the internet user, you want to use any, sorry, you want to secure any application, you want to secure any brand, it's just a matter of minutes. You can do it.
Read full review
  • Provides a secure VPN connection point for endpoint connectivity.
  • Provides the VPN connectivity in a fast and reliable connection state.
  • Very dependable, once connected the connection stays up and there's no fuss.
  • Very good at letting you know when you are not authenticated.
  • Very easy to authenticate and regain access when your session times out.
Read full review
Cons
  • I think it's a very hard question or a tricky question to answer right now. Some capabilities are handled by the Umbrella at the backend. So basically it's not that bad. What we do is if we want to enable some of the capabilities, sometimes it actually does a close launch to a different route. So if we can have more and more features to be integrated right out of the Meraki dashboard, that is the only improvement that I see. Other than that, this product is really, really good.
Read full review
  • ZS CLI support to turn off ZIA and ZDX service specifically on mac.
  • Better visibility into failed posture devices, including a timeline and the reason the posture failed (This is about the Zscaler mobile portal: Enrolled devices --> Failed posture devices).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco Secure Connect is designed as a unified, turnkey solution that simplifies the complexities of managing network and security functions in hybrid work settings. It combines Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) capabilities with Security Service Edge (SSE), allowing organizations to manage both networking and security from a single dashboard. This integration can lead to improved operational efficiency, making it easier for IT teams to oversee their infrastructure.
Read full review
While Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) delivers critical value in cloud security and RBI compliance, I rate renewal likelihood 7/10 due to evolving needs versus platform limitations. Below is my rationale:
Key Gaps:
1. Advanced Threat Costs:
ZIA’s add-ons (e.g., Advanced DLP, Sandboxing) incur 35%+ cost premiums – straining budgets as transaction volumes (UPI/iMobile) grow 50% YoY.
2. API Banking Scalability:
ZIA’s API rate limits throttle real-time policy sync during UPI peaks (10K+ TPS), forcing workarounds for finacle integrations.
3. RBI Future-Proofing:
Limited native support for upcoming digital rupee (CBDC) security rules requires custom development, increasing compliance overhead.
Read full review
Usability
I gave this rating because it delivers the strongly on things that matters the most to our business like security, reliability and better user experience. It provides the secure access policies and it supports the MFA which reduces the risk. We can securely work from anywhere without any trouble also it supports both on prem and cloud access.
Read full review
The product is as expected. ZIA has been integrated and utilized as intended. Any modifications to rules in ZCC have been straightforward to implement. Although it has not been done yet, the segmentation for specific users is highly anticipated. The product received a 9, as no product is wholly perfect, but it has been great to use.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
It is better than any other vpn application
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Better performance compared to compititor
Read full review
There are often performance issues reported
Read full review
Support Rating
never used it
Read full review
Zscaler's ZIA support is quick and knowledgable. They respond within 1-2 hours of you submitting your ticket. They are very thorough and are typically ready to jump on a live troubleshooting session. Our ZIA platform and how we use is it unique so at times tickets can be open for weeks but we alway get quality support compared to other unrelated product support in our enterprise
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Very quick and easy, its a tidy set up, no messy cables and the sound and video quality is excellent. I use this weekly for home calls and larger team calls across the UK and Europe and have no problems. The engineers were in and out within a couple of hours
Read full review
good the engineer give excellent support and eplanation
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco Secure Connect allows for secure connections to critical systems with a better performance while maintaining security for users and business processes, maintaining the company policies and security posture for improved end user experience without impact on the services. Better tool tested when considering technical requirements and security posture requirements.
Read full review
We keep using the other products, but for network traffic Zscaler Internet Access tends to be the best solution, although for Infoblox we are using their DNS solution, and for CrowdStrike, we are focusing on other items more related to EDR than network.
Read full review
Scalability
It is flexible across desktop os and mobile os
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • The positive impact is that businesses has reduced the dependency on physical hardware by moving and adapting its cloud services and on-prem security.
  • Due to the centralized management, it is easy for developer like us to manage the dashboard and also reduces the time spent on security task and routine networks.
  • Cisco Secure Connect is providing a strong ROI because it reduces infrastructure cists, improved IT tasks, enhances security which is very beneficial for long term businesses.
Read full review
  • I would say it has a very good ROI, as whenever someone can't access something, they submit a ticket to our network engineer, and within minutes, the site is safely added to ZIA with best-practice configurations. After seeing a little of the UI from the Zenith event, it seems very user-friendly to control these policies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zscaler Internet Access Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA), a cloud native security service edge (SSE) solution that builds on a decade of secure web gateway leadership. Offered as a scalable SaaS platform through Zscaler's security cloud, it replaces legacy network security solutions, preventing advanced attacks and data loss with a comprehensive zero trust approach. ZIA is integrated into the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange™ to provide superior defense-in-depth, secure connectivity, end user experience, and administrative visibility and control.