Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) vs CrowdStrike Falcon

• lightweight connector
• great integration with other security products
• highly effective
• will also alert for vulnerable software being used on your systems

Read full review

• Ransomware protection. We ran a ransomware simulation with obfuscated executables to hide malware signatures and CrowdStrike found and stopped 15 out of 15.
• Malware/adware detection. Packaged adware in official installers are instantly blocked without interfering with the install of the primary application.

Read full review

• Sometimes during whitelisting, other files from security tools get isolated even if it's not user intended.
• Re-syncing policies also take some time, albeit in a straightforward process.
• As with all security software, false-positives are still detected.
• Hoping that once the library is expanded further, the false positives will be fewer.

Read full review

• We get false positive detections when we run an email signature script for our users. These false positives can be a distraction. We've implemented a whitelist for those behaviors, but had some difficulty in figuring out how to configure CrowdStrike to recognize these executions since the file name and hash were always different (the executing file was firstname_lastname.exe, and that was too Vague to whitelist.

Read full review

• HAMP has allowed the team to focus on value added activities instead of constant cleanup of workstations and servers.
• AMP is probably not the most cost effective solution, but is very good at protecting your systems.

Read full review

• CrowdStrike has cut our security costs.
• Has given us more insight into our end points.
• It has helped with our older PC's CPU usage.
• Cut our cost and time from managing multiple platforms down to managing one platform with better insight than what we had with multiple security platforms.

Read full review