Close.io is a customer relationship management (CRM) software with call management and sales workflow automation capabilities.
$19
per month includes 1 user
LeadsPedia
Score10 out of 10
N/A
LeadsPedia is a hosted Lead Distribution and Call Tracking and Routing Software that provides users with advanced validation, verification, routing, and monitoring capabilities. LeadsPedia is designed to make information easier to see one place and use it to make faster, better‑informed decisions about sales and marketing.
$1,000
per month
Pricing
Close CRM
LeadsPedia
Editions & Modules
Solo
$9
per month (paid annually) per user
Essentials
$35
per month (paid annually) per user
Growth
$99
per month (paid annually) per user
Scale
$139
per month (paid annually) per user
Starter
1,000
per month
Lite
1,500
per month
Premium
2,500
per month
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Close CRM
LeadsPedia
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
The pricing listed here reflects up to a 35% discount for paying annually. Monthly billing is available at of $19 per user for the Solo plan (only 1 user allowed), $49 per user for the Essentials plan, $109 per user for the Growth plan, and $149 per user for the Scale plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Close CRM
LeadsPedia
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
8.9
8 Ratings
13% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
7.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
9.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
8.5
6 Ratings
10% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Case management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
7.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
9.0
6 Ratings
15% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Task management
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
7.5
6 Ratings
2% below category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
4.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
8.6
8 Ratings
12% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Custom fields
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
6.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
8.0
8 Ratings
5% below category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Social data
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Feature
Close CRM
6.4
4 Ratings
16% below category average
LeadsPedia
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Close CRM and LeadsPedia
Excellent software to increase sales and follow up with existing and new customers. Email and SMS handling are really easy for the sales team, managing leads is really great, and Close merges duplicate leads to help our Data Leads avoid repetitive and unnecessary calls. As mentioned in some comments before, must improve in reports, Close is not appropriate to handle or track agents' hours making it necessary to implement additional software to cover this area.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Leadspedia is perfect for lead-gen campaigns. It makes tracking very simple. It's great for CPA,CPC and CPL campaigns. I've never tried using it for a CPV type campaign, so I'm not sure how it does with that
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Email sequences. Create and send a sequence of emails until the sequence finishes or the contact replies to your email. You can also pause the sequence manually.
Email sync. Syncs in real time with your email account, which is huge.
Zapier integration. We've automated a lot of our pipeline management through the Zapier integration. This saves us soooo much time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I'd love to see LeadsPedia modernize its user interface. The UI already intuitive, but it looks a little outdated.
I'd love to see LeadsPedia continue integrating with new solution provides in the marketplace. They've done this well, but they should continue these efforts.
I'd love to see LeadsPedia build out a robust knowledgebase to educate end users on all of their features and functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's my favorite CRM to recommend to sales organizations. Robust Telephony options including a Power Dialer, SMS, and Voice Drop, are completely integrated into the CRM. The kicker is you can have "Unlimited" contacts where many platforms charge based on the number of users. This can make a huge difference in monthly billing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven't really had the need to use their support, but the only time I had an issue with the platform, the Close team was very attentive and responded in a short span of time. Also they take minimal time to solve issues. The only con here is there is no way to reach out to them apart from email.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Pipedrive was great for us for a long time. We used it for over 4 years. Our product and process was simple. When things got more complex, we needed something that could handle our growing needs and Pipedrive kept falling short. We built our own custom solution in Airtable and though it worked, we spend a lot of time managing it. Close was able to solve all our issues and save us hours per week in admin work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Previously, we had to use both CAKE and Invoca seperately. Cake for lead tracking, and Invoca for call tracking. Now we only have to use one platform, Leadspedia. It's much more user friendly, and makes campaign setup incredibly simple. Wish we would've switched to Leadspedia ages ago.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info