Close.io is a customer relationship management (CRM) software with call management and sales workflow automation capabilities.
$19
per month includes 1 user
Workamajig
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Close CRM
Workamajig
Editions & Modules
Solo
$9
per month (paid annually) per user
Essentials
$35
per month (paid annually) per user
Growth
$99
per month (paid annually) per user
Scale
$139
per month (paid annually) per user
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Close CRM
Workamajig
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
The pricing listed here reflects up to a 35% discount for paying annually. Monthly billing is available at of $19 per user for the Solo plan (only 1 user allowed), $49 per user for the Essentials plan, $109 per user for the Growth plan, and $149 per user for the Scale plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Close CRM
Workamajig
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
8.9
8 Ratings
13% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
7.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
9.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
8.5
6 Ratings
10% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Case management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
7.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
9.0
6 Ratings
15% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Task management
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
7.5
6 Ratings
2% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
4.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
8.6
8 Ratings
12% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Custom fields
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
6.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
8.0
8 Ratings
5% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Social data
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
6.4
4 Ratings
16% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Mobile access
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Feature
Close CRM
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.16 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Close CRM and Workamajig
Excellent software to increase sales and follow up with existing and new customers. Email and SMS handling are really easy for the sales team, managing leads is really great, and Close merges duplicate leads to help our Data Leads avoid repetitive and unnecessary calls. As mentioned in some comments before, must improve in reports, Close is not appropriate to handle or track agents' hours making it necessary to implement additional software to cover this area.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Email sequences. Create and send a sequence of emails until the sequence finishes or the contact replies to your email. You can also pause the sequence manually.
Email sync. Syncs in real time with your email account, which is huge.
Zapier integration. We've automated a lot of our pipeline management through the Zapier integration. This saves us soooo much time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's my favorite CRM to recommend to sales organizations. Robust Telephony options including a Power Dialer, SMS, and Voice Drop, are completely integrated into the CRM. The kicker is you can have "Unlimited" contacts where many platforms charge based on the number of users. This can make a huge difference in monthly billing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven't really had the need to use their support, but the only time I had an issue with the platform, the Close team was very attentive and responded in a short span of time. Also they take minimal time to solve issues. The only con here is there is no way to reach out to them apart from email.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Pipedrive was great for us for a long time. We used it for over 4 years. Our product and process was simple. When things got more complex, we needed something that could handle our growing needs and Pipedrive kept falling short. We built our own custom solution in Airtable and though it worked, we spend a lot of time managing it. Close was able to solve all our issues and save us hours per week in admin work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info