Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs. Google App Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Data Science Workbench
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Cloudera Data Science Workbench enables secure self-service data science for the enterprise. It is a collaborative environment where developers can work with a variety of libraries and frameworks.N/A
Google App Engine
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Google App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Pricing
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starting Price
$0.05
Per Hour Per Instance
Max Price
$0.30
Per Hour Per Instance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Features
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.5
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.6
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Visualization7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.8
2 Ratings
5% below category average
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.6
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Google App Engine
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
-
Ratings
Google App Engine
9.5
32 Ratings
20% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings9.018 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings10.032 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings9.032 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings10.031 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings10.028 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings10.029 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings10.028 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings10.029 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.0
(35 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(7 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(2 ratings)
8.4
(12 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudera Data Science WorkbenchGoogle App Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudera
Organizations which already implemented on-premise Hadoop based Cloudera Data Platform (CDH) for their Big Data warehouse architecture will definitely get more value from seamless integration of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW) with their existing CDH Platform. However, for organizations with hybrid (cloud and on-premise) data platform without prior implementation of CDH, implementing CDSW can be a challenge technically and financially.
Read full review
Google
App Engine is such a good resource for our team both internally and externally. You have complete control over your app, how it runs, when it runs, and more while Google handles the back-end, scaling, orchestration, and so on. If you are serving a tool, system, or web page, it's perfect. If you are serving something back-end, like an automation or ETL workflow, you should be a little considerate or careful with how you are structuring that job. For instance, the Standard environment in Google App Engine will present you with a resource limit for your server calls. If your operations are known to take longer than, say, 10 minutes or so, you may be better off moving to the Flexible environment (which may be a little more expensive but certainly a little more powerful and a little less limited) or even moving that workflow to something like Google Compute Engine or another managed service.
Read full review
Pros
Cloudera
  • One single IDE (browser based application) that makes Scala, R, Python integrated under one tool
  • For larger organizations/teams, it lets you be self reliant
  • As it sits on your cluster, it has very easy access of all the data on the HDFS
  • Linking with Github is a very good way to keep the code versions intact
Read full review
Google
  • Quick to develop, quick to deploy. You can be up and running on Google App Engine in no time.
  • Flexible. We use Java for some services and Node.js for others.
  • Great security features. We have been consistently impressed with the security and authentication features of Google App Engine.
Read full review
Cons
Cloudera
  • Installation is difficult.
  • Upgrades are difficult.
  • Licensing options are not flexible.
Read full review
Google
  • There is a slight learning curve to getting used to code on Google App Engine.
  • Google Cloud Datastore is Google's NoSQL database in the cloud that your applications can use. NoSQL databases, by design, cannot give handle complex queries on the data. This means that sometimes you need to think carefully about your data structures - so that you can get the results you need in your code.
  • Setting up billing is a little annoying. It does not seem to save billing information to your account so you can re-use the same information across different Cloud projects. Each project requires you to re-enter all your billing information (if required)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cloudera
No answers on this topic
Google
App Engine is a solid choice for deployments to Google Cloud Platform that do not want to move entirely to a Kubernetes-based container architecture using a different Google product. For rapid prototyping of new applications and fairly straightforward web application deployments, we'll continue to leverage the capabilities that App Engine affords us.
Read full review
Usability
Cloudera
No answers on this topic
Google
I had to revisit the UI after a year of just setting up and forgetting. The UI got some improvements but the amount of navigation we have to go through to setup a new app has increased but also got easier to setup. Gemini now is integrated and make getting answers faster
Read full review
Support Rating
Cloudera
Cloudera Data Science Workbench has excellence online resources support such as documentation and examples. On top of that the enterprise license also comes with SLA on opening a ticket to Cloudera Services and support for complaint handling and troubleshooting by email or through a phone call. On top of that it also offers additional paid training services.
Read full review
Google
Good amount of documentation available for Google App Engine and in general there is large developer community around Google App Engine and other products it interacts with. Lastly, Google support is great in general. No issues so far with them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cloudera
Both the tools have similar features and have made it pretty easy to install/deploy/use. Depending on your existing platform (Cloudera vs. Azure) you need to pick the Workbench. Another observation is that Cloudera has better support where you can get feedback on your questions pretty fast (unlike MS). As its a new product, I expect MS to be more efficient in handling customers questions.
Read full review
Google
We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as compared to the other major players in Azure and AWS.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cloudera
  • Paid off for demonstration purposes.
Read full review
Google
  • Effective employee adoption through ease of use.
  • Effective integration to other java based frameworks.
  • Time to market is very quick. Build, test, deploy and use.
  • The GAE Whitelist for java is an important resource to know what works and what does not. So use it. It would also be nice for Google to expand on items that are allowed on GAE platform.
Read full review
ScreenShots