CloverDX vs. TIBCO Data Virtualization

CloverDX designer as a standalone is well suited for fairly straightforward transformations of data. If you want to do large scale data integrations, then their server edition adds an extra level of automation and job control.

Incentivized

Well suited: Useful for aggregating data sources and creating a master view to be used across Org streams/ units. Less appropriate: Not a lot of organs use TDV solely because it is marketed as a sole virtualization product rather than a suite of products. Moreover, there is definitely room for improvement when it comes to the user interface, especially the web manager console.

Incentivized

• Connects with Salesforce very well
• The graphical view of the transformations allows for easy creations and maintenance
• Support has always been eager to assist with any graph creation difficulties I run into

Incentivized

• Connecting to different data silos and presenting the data as a singled unified layer of data.
• Exposing data to Technical and non technical users through Web UI or reporting tools
• Secured exposure of data as web services.
• Row level and column level data security
• Multi tenancy data security.
• Real time data by connecting to the operational databases
• Historical data generation

Incentivized

• The initial learning curve is a little steep. Not very steep or super steep, just a little steep.
• Having enough memory for large multi-step problems can be an issue if the graph isn't designed well.

Incentivized

• Performance of TDV Studio (its own IDE) is poor.
• Performance of TDV repository database is rather poor for larger numbers of objects .(Note: We have approx. 9tsd objects introspected in TDV and approx. 20tsd objects generated in upper DV layers.)
• Propagation of privileges to parent/child dependencies does not work when applying recursively on a folder. (It's a huge setback when working with large number of objects organized semantically into subfolders.)
• Lack of command line client interface for scripting at the time of version 8.4 (I had to write my own CLI.)
• TDV Studio does an absolutely horrible job with its own code editors when indentation is in place. Also, the editor is brutally slow and feature-poor.
• Tracking privileges on the level of table/view columns causes occasional problems when regranting.
• TDV's stored programs ("SQL scripts" in their own terminology) compiler leaves out many syntactic and semantic checks, making them hugely prone to run-time errors.
• TDV Server's REST API is a very poor (in terms of features) and flawed cousin to its SOAP API (at the time of version 8.4).

Incentivized

It is useful for us to see the data and do analysis. Also we use it to generate reports and see trends or gather insights

Incentivized

It has a drag-and-drop feature and a good list of data adapters which makes it easy to thread across elements of various data sources.

Incentivized

We have never encountered issues where it was unavailable when we needed it.

Incentivized

It really is a product with excellent performance, the impact within the company has been very good since different processes have been improved in different areas, both data analysis, development, integrations, and best of all, it has not affected the users. Different systems with which it has connectivity to obtain the information.

Incentivized

While CloverDX has an active forum for users to submit questions and assist with answers, their in house support team is incredibly responsive when I've contacted them for assistance. This seems almost at odds with most other software companies who try to save money on tech support by promoting a forum or knowledge base.

Incentivized

On a few occasions I have asked TIBCO technical support for help because I have adapted perfectly to their tools, but in those few that I have communicated with their technical team I have received personalized, attentive, responsible attention and I am always assisted by an expert staff the topic. A TIBCO technical support technician spent more than an hour helping me to solve a problem in the initial stage of implementation in my department and this is something that I always appreciate.

Incentivized

The training was helpful. I was able to understand how to use TIBCO for the data load process that we implemented and how to perform various troubleshooting steps based on the training I received. The technician was thorough and took the time to answer any questions. Once we were shown how to use TIBCO in the test environment, we were able to configure the production environment ourselves.

Incentivized

Other vendors have clearer, more visual implementation documentation. We also did not have our data architect and and server administrator available full-time for implementation. In the future, we will secure the necessary internal resources.

Incentivized

CloverDX was a less expensive alternative to Talend and had a more intuitive interface from what I could see during the evaluation.

Incentivized

[TIBCO Data Virtualization] is [has great performance] and [the] overall cost is much reasonable than other competitors. The wide range of services/features make it the perfect solution for our data needs. [TIBCO Data Virtualization] has always met our quality needs.

Incentivized

It seems to be flexible and scalable based on our needs.

Incentivized

• Work that use to take multiple people 20 to 30 hours a week to complete each has now been fully automated to where only 1 or 2 hours a week for maintenance is required.

Incentivized

• We took spreadsheets that took hours a month to update and made them update automatically using TDV, saving hours a month of analyst time
• The incremental cost of TDV relative to straight spotfire licensing made it a no-brainer due to the ease of data management
• We continue to automate legacy business processes in TDV, saving time all over the organization.

Incentivized