Cocoon Data vs. Progress ShareFile
Cocoon Data vs. Progress ShareFile
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cocoon Data | N/A | Cocoon Data headquartered in Arlington works with governments, enterprises, and SMEs around the globe, to keep regulated or commercially sensitive data safe. Their secure file-sharing platform allows users to collaborate and share sensitive data outside firewalls, securely and compliantly. The solution is designed for applications in deep intelligence, to enable governments, Fortune500 and SMBs to meet strict data security and compliance standards. | $15 per month per user | |
Progress ShareFile | N/A | ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011. | $52.80 per month 3 users (minimum) |
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile |
|---|
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
|
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SugarSync Score 4.3 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 4.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (113 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (8 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 6.5 (26 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (14 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (14 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 6.5 (2 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Cocoon Data | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Pros | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Cons | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Usability | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Performance | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Support Rating | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Scalability | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Cocoon Data No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| ScreenShots | Progress ShareFile Screenshots |














