Code Compare vs. GitHub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Code Compare
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Code Compare is a compare tool designed to compare and merge differing files and folders. Code Compare integrates with source control systems: TFS, SVN, Git, Mercurial, and Perforce. Code Compare is shipped both as a standalone file diff tool and a Visual Studio extension.N/A
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
GitHub is a platform that hosts public and private code and provides software development and collaboration tools. Features include version control, issue tracking, code review, team management, syntax highlighting, etc. Personal plans ($0-50), Organizational plans ($0-200), and Enterprise plans are available.
$4
per month per user
Pricing
Code CompareGitHub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$40
per year per user
Enterprise
$210
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Code CompareGitHub
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Code CompareGitHub
Features
Code CompareGitHub
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Code Compare
-
Ratings
GitHub
8.8
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Branching and Merging00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
Version History00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools00 Ratings9.16 Ratings
Pull Requests00 Ratings9.57 Ratings
Code Review Tools00 Ratings8.46 Ratings
Project Access Control00 Ratings7.97 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Branch Protection00 Ratings9.46 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Code CompareGitHub
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.2 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.5 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Code CompareGitHub
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
8.9
(128 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(26 ratings)
User Testimonials
Code CompareGitHub
Likelihood to Recommend
Devart
If your developer team is well-versed with standard VCS then I don't think they need this additional software to occupy their memory, they already have those capabilities within all VCS. A well-suited use case can be a team where not everybody has knowledge of VCS but has to collaborate on a project.
Read full review
GitHub
GitHub is an easy to go tool when it comes to Version Controlling, CI/CD workflows, Integration with third party softwares. It's effective for any level of CI/CD implementation you would like to. Also the the cost of product is also very competitive and affordable. As of now GitHub lacks capabilities when it comes to detailed project management in comparison to tools like Jira, but overall its value for money.
Read full review
Pros
Devart
  • Easy to compare files and folders as it provides many features to set different colors while matching.
  • Easy to sync local clones with the production system.
  • It allows to user to compare the file within multiple windows.
Read full review
GitHub
  • Version control: GitHub provides a powerful and flexible Git-based version control system that allows teams to track changes to their code over time, collaborate on code with others, and maintain a history of their work.
  • Code review: GitHub's pull request system enables teams to review code changes, discuss suggestions and merge changes in a central location. This makes it easier to catch bugs and ensure that code quality remains high.
  • Collaboration: GitHub provides a variety of collaboration tools to help teams work together effectively, including issue tracking, project management, and wikis.
Read full review
Cons
Devart
  • Dark mode would have been a welcome change.
  • UI could be updated to latest standard rather than old windows square looking UI.
  • Despite being simple to use, a user guide would be appreciated.
Read full review
GitHub
  • Not an easy tool for beginners. Prior command-line experience is expected to get started with GitHub efficiently.
  • Unlike other source control platforms GitHub is a little confusing. With no proper GUI tool its hard to understand the source code version/history.
  • Working with larger files can be tricky. For file sizes above 100MB, GitHub expects the developer to use different commands (lfs).
  • While using the web version of GitHub, it has some restrictions on the number of files that can be uploaded at once. Recommended action is to use the command-line utility to add and push files into the repository.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Devart
No answers on this topic
GitHub
GitHub's ease of use and continued investment into the Developer Experience have made it the de facto tool for our engineers to manage software changes. With new features that continue to come out, we have been able to consolidate several other SaaS solutions and reduce the number of tools required for each engineer to perform their job responsibilities.
Read full review
Usability
Devart
No answers on this topic
GitHub
GitHub is the premiere tool 'sfor version control across all organizations. While there are other similar tools available from various vendors. GitHub implementation is superior to them all making all aspects of version control significantly easier to manage vs other solutions. Team management, billing, user restrictions, issue management, code reviews, documentation all available in a central location.
Read full review
Support Rating
Devart
No answers on this topic
GitHub
There are a ton of resources and tutorials for GitHub online. The sheer number of people who use GitHub ensures that someone has the exact answer you are looking for. The docs on GitHub itself are very thorough as well. You will often find an official doc along with the hundreds of independent tutorials that answers your question, which is unusual for most online services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Devart
No answers on this topic
GitHub
While I don't have very much experience with these 2 solutions, they're two of the most popular alternatives to GitHub. Bitbucket is from Atlassian, which may make sense for a team that is already using other Atlassian tools like Jira, Confluence, and Trello, as their integration will likely be much tighter. Gitlab on the other hand has a reputation as a very capable GitHub replacement with some features that are not available on GitHub like firewall tools.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Devart
  • It helps to save a lot of effort hours as we can synch code with few simple steps.
  • Easily to check customers issues with the help of local and production changes.
  • Helps to deploy the service packs on a production system.
Read full review
GitHub
  • Team collaboration significantly improved as everything is clearly logged and maintained.
  • Maintaining a good overview of items will be delivered wrt the roadmap for example.
  • Knowledge management and tracking. Over time a lot of tickets, issues and comments are logged. GitHub is a great asset to go back and review why x was y.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Code Compare Screenshots

Screenshot of