CoderPad vs. Harver

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoderPad
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
CoderPad is a technical interview platform from the company of the same name in San Francisco, ideally used by development teams to enable a quick, accurate read on a candidate's skills through the hiring process. According to the vendor, CoderPad works like an IDE to help candidates share their skills and ensure the interviewer understands how the candidate works. The platform supports collaborative coding sessions and take-home assignments.
$50
per month
Harver
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Harver, now including OutMatch, which merged with Harver in 2021, is a hiring solution that automates recruitment processes from apply to hire.N/A
Pricing
CoderPadHarver
Editions & Modules
Personal
$50
per month (5 interviews)
Team
$250
per month (30 interviews)
Business
$750
per month (90 interviews)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoderPadHarver
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$15/interview for overages
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoderPadHarver
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
CoderPadHarver
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Renaissance Star Assessments
Renaissance Star Assessments
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

WileyPLUS
WileyPLUS
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

WileyPLUS
WileyPLUS
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoderPadHarver
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(3 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoderPadHarver
Likelihood to Recommend
CoderPad
- To conduct a preliminary assessment round when there are multiple candidates to choose from. Helps you to filter out candidates on the basis of requirements. - The questions that are assigned for each test are different, so the probability of any two candidates getting the exact same questions is very less. -However, the questions are based on the same concepts so as to provide an equal ground to all the candidates.- However, if you have to choose from less number of candidates you are better off conducting normal interviews, as these tests are time-consuming for both interviewers and employers.
Read full review
Harver
Harver is a unique and efficient talent matching platform, this platform helps HR departments to easily identify the best talent for our open positions. Harver is easy to use and set up, has a solid user interface, with great integrations (quite limited, but good), plus it provides a pleasant experience for job seekers, making it easy for them to find the right job.
Read full review
Pros
CoderPad
  • Large range of supported languages
  • Code runs quickly
  • Allows for intractability between interviewer and interviewee
Read full review
Harver
  • They provide accurate candidate data.
  • Facilitates hiring decisions.
  • I can conduct video interviews.
  • Integrates with the following applications: Connexys Recruiting Software, Jobvite, SmartRecruiters, TalentSoft, etc.
Read full review
Cons
CoderPad
  • Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions
  • Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily
  • A transparent and publicly available pricing
Read full review
Harver
  • Customer Service initially was poor, but we now have a good account manager. However, compared to Checkster, (outmatch acquired) there is a clear service level difference.
Read full review
Usability
CoderPad
CoderPad is incredibly easy to use, not much to note.
Read full review
Harver
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CoderPad
We did use other option other than CoderPad. Before CoderPad we were using references for hiring but then again the whole process of assessment was not easy. It takes time. CoderPad came to our lives through a reference and since then it has somewhat changed the way we see hiring.
Read full review
Harver
I've been with the company for 6 years and we have always used OutMatch so I don't really have anything to compare to
Read full review
Return on Investment
CoderPad
  • 10 working hours saved weekly which used to be spent on interviews
  • Approximately 3 employees worth of manpower is saved
  • The benefit of allowing assessment in multiple languages allowed the interviewee to concentrate on evaluation on the basis of underlying concepts
Read full review
Harver
  • Better quality of hire, reducing is less turnover during probation.
  • Reduction in cost of hire.
  • Reduction in time to hire.
Read full review
ScreenShots