TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cofense Vision vs. OpenText Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cofense Vision

    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Cofense Vision stores emails offline and provides threat hunting analytics. Cofense Vision allows the user to search and quarantine emails in minutes — across an entire organization, and is designed to provide threat hunting at speed.N/A

    OpenText Threat Detection and Response

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AA combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation.N/A

    Proofpoint Security Awareness Training

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AProofpoint Security Awareness Training (formerly ThreatSim from Wombat Security) is a cloud-based training platform that simulates threat scenarios (e.g. phishing) and also provides assessment testing developed by Wombat Technologies, which was acquired by Proofpoint in March 2018.N/A
    Pricing
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Considered Multiple Products
    Cofense
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Proofpoint
    Chose Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    The decision was based on the ease of use and the better security awareness material at Proofpoint.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    60%
    Would buy again
    3 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    41 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    41 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    35 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    80%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    40 Answers
    Features
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Cofense Vision and OpenText Threat Detection and Response and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Feature
    Cofense Vision
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Threat Detection and Response
    5.5
    4 Ratings
    36% below category average
    Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Correlation00 Ratings9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility00 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings5.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data integration/API management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Cofense Vision and OpenText Threat Detection and Response and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Feature
    Cofense Vision
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Threat Detection and Response
    -
    Ratings
    Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Single sign-on capability00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Security Awareness Training
    Comparison of Security Awareness Training features of Cofense Vision and OpenText Threat Detection and Response and Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Feature
    Cofense Vision
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Threat Detection and Response
    -
    Ratings
    Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Training Content Library00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multilingual Training Content00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Training Gamification00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Industry-Specific Security Training00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Individualized Security Training Plans00 Ratings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Phishing Simulations00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Security Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Hoxhunt
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
    Score7.1 out of 10
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (46 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.3
    (44 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cofense VisionOpenText Threat Detection and ResponseProofpoint Security Awareness Training
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cofense
    It is well suited in environments where there is a high mail traffic to handle. [Cofense] Vision basically journals the exchange server and keeps a copy of the mail received in the environment. Really beneficial to revoke and quarantine the mail reported by one user, but footprint is there in other mailboxes as well. Less appropriate in the cases where there is no proper segregation of duties within the organization. As it is possible to see contents of the mail. Only authorized personnel should be able to use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    In the current lot of hundreds of SIEM solutions out there in the market, ArcSight ESM is fairly less expensive with strong fundamentals in place. The log ingestion, correlation are very well performing and totally worth ROI. However, the tool has lost its way when it comes to staying abreast with current feature curve of SIEM technology and the evolution has not been done by MicroFocus. Search times are high and there is no major plug-in that has been introduced as part of the product life cycle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Perfect for regular (monthly) training of staff versus a "one and done" annual assignment on Cyber Security. Allows for a greater number of topics to be covered and for creating a "culture" of security awareness among all Staff throughout the entire company. NOT a replacement for IT Security Certifications amongst your technical staff (CISSPs & GSLCs on staff are a must have). Your Proofpoint Account Rep does most of the heavy lifting, but the program still requires "care and feeding" (resources) within your organization - preparing monthly user lists for training assignments and preparing reports for leadership on participation & progress
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cofense
    • AutoQuaratine prevents in advance and eliminates possible malicious emails from users' inboxes.
    • [Cofense Vision] optimizes protection against any phishing attack.
    • It is simple, friendly and easy to use.
    • [Cofense Vision provides] super detailed analysis reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Integration with smart logger and ESM to create rules and easy management of the same.
    • Easy integration with all end point security management tool(IPS/IDS, Firewall, Anti-Virus) and their consolidated output at a single place to effectively rectifying true and false positives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • Proofpoint has a huge library of phishing emails to choose from. They add new examples every week.
    • The training modules are fun and interactive and keep the user engaged.
    • The posters, and downloadable materials are amazing and really give a great visual to support your security campaigns.
    • The product is easy to use, and Proofpoint Support Staff are always available to help with any issues you have.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cofense
    • Its cost can be somewhat high when it comes to a small business, so it is perfectly suited to medium or large companies.
    • It can throw problems when it comes to migrating said tool in the different versions of an email.
    • Its configuration is simple, but it is important to fully understand its operation to give adequate responses to possible threats.
    • It would be ideal if it could be integrated with your platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It is slow comparing to any other SIEM Tool.
    • We have to create filter for each alerts need some custom filter .
    • Here we dont have any single tab for see all the alerts .also need some attractive features for dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • The lack of a user rating on "cyber risk" is proving to be an immense difficulty. As we are looking at how to better hold our employees accountable as well as provide increased learning opportunities for those who need it most, it is becoming cumbersome--especially given the fact this is starting to become the standard for Security Awareness companies. The lack of this is resulting in a manual process vs being able to automate and moderate, thus taking up time and resources, which are always at a scarcity. It can also be cumbersome to look across the tools to see how a particular user is doing, vs being able to view all of their data in one space.
    • If you are a marketer, the editors for the Phishing Templates and Teachable Moments are quite frustrating. They feel out of date and clunky, as well as not featuring an auto-save, so you could lose the templates you are building. At this point, I have actually started to work in other email creation editors and learning HTML, to better customize and then moving all of the code into the editor. It has thus far proven to be less of a headache. I also do not believe the average user is working on branding their program, creating consistency for easy of navigation, and including additional resources in their teachable moments in the way we currently are. However, as more social science backgrounds continue to enter security awareness, I believe this will move towards the norm.
    • Some of the reporting numbers for Simulated Phishing could be better. For example, telling me how many people acknowledged the teachable moment out of the full email campaign is less meaningful than knowing how many people acknowledged it, from those who actually triggered/were shown the teachable moment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Proofpoint
    • The product is great for what we use it for
    • We have a good relationship with our vendor/Proofpoint, which I believe is needed to be successful in Security Awareness and using tools like this
    • The package/service as a whole is incredibly helpful
    • The integrations with Proofpoint's Trap is one of the most valuable things we could do. It turns your entire email user base into members of IT security, to be on the look out to report cyber attacks, and have them pulled out of everyone's email if the email is condemed/found malicious.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Overall, it is a good investment in order for an organization to stay compliant and stay secure from all the wild things happening. It is definitely a cost effective tool with some good features including correlation, log storage, reporting and dashboards. If a customer is looking for advanced set of features, then I would highly not recommend this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Overall, PSAT is integral to what we do. PSAT is a helpful tool to help us improve our employees ability to recognize, report, and respond to phishing. It works for us to use a longterm partner, who is incredibly helpful/supportive, and also bringing Proofpoint's greater cybersecurity & attack intelligence into PSAT. Honestly, we are pretty happy and would make the choice to go with PSAT again (we evaluated the major players in the space via Gartner's Magic Quadrant). The team behind the products are excellent and the product of itself is both intuitive and expansive. This combination allows us to reach our 10k+ employees who are located in over 20 countries
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cofense
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    I personally haven't reached the support team, however, the engineers never complained about the Arcsight support team. We had some issues with the tool in the past but every time we reached the support, all issues were resolved in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Proofpoint support has always been above average. A lot of companies provide a customer service manager for your account but few have proved as connected as Proofpoint. The CSM was able to give us a good start with the product and checked in periodically. I found them always helpful with any questions and very knowledgeable about the platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cofense
    Apple of Discord is the pricing as we were looking for an email security tool in reasonable pricing and Barracuda was undoubtedly efficient in action and was compatible with our business but it was highly expensive and then we made up our mind for another tool and Cofense Vision was offering almost the same as Barracuda but cheaper.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Multiple platforms are already supported by Arcsight. Support is good. Scripts can be used to get data from multiple threat intel sources & the same can be used in correlation rules to detect any suspicious activity. Reporting features are good & you can check any backdated information within new clicks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    All three products have the pros and cons. Since we use other Proofpoint products, TAP, TRAP, etc. the integration with PSAT is much better. The other products do not integrate with TRAP nearly as well as PSAT.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cofense
    • Many Phishing attacks are identified and prevented in an instant.
    • Classification of activity helps analysts search and find which emails pose a larger threat.
    • User interface and learning is simple and easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Logger helps us to decrease incident response times.
    • It also decreased our project times with the man/day calculations. Before this solution, it may take up to 10 men/days to do something. After this, it becomes nearly half of the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • Positively made our staff more aware of current phishing threats.
    • Gives our staff a sense of accomplishment when they recognize a phishing email.
    • Helped reinforce our values in the mandatory Information Security training each employee takes (for example, they are already aware of the signs of a phishing email before they take the training).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots