Constructor.io Search vs. Wyng

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Constructor.io Search
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Constructor Search promises to improve conversions and revenue from onsite and in-app search, using search science and artificial intelligence, Constructor's cloud-based search-as-a-service solution uses natural language processing, machine learning-enhanced results ranking, collaborative personalization, and merchant controls to power enterprise-grade onsite and in-app search. Whether search results are optimized for relevance, revenue, conversions, conversations — or all of the…N/A
Wyng
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Wyng is used to build interactive digital experiences that engage customers at the right moments, collect their preferences and other zero-party data, and personalize their website experiences in real time. Whether the experience is a product finder quiz, promotion, or preference center, Wyng experiences are designed to be well-timed and user-friendly while offering genuine value to consumers.N/A
Pricing
Constructor.io SearchWyng
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Constructor.io SearchWyng
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Constructor.io SearchWyng
Small Businesses
Bloomreach Commerce Experience Cloud
Bloomreach Commerce Experience Cloud
Score 8.7 out of 10
Bloomreach Commerce Experience Cloud
Bloomreach Commerce Experience Cloud
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.8 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.8 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Constructor.io SearchWyng
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Constructor.io SearchWyng
Likelihood to Recommend
Constructor.io Corporation
Constructor.io Search takes all of the guesswork out of maintaining a search engine. As merchandisers or product teams, we have educated guesses at how search relevance should work but the customer is always king. We can't always predict the ways in which consumers will search or what their intent is. That's why the behavioral-driven approach that Constructor.io employs works so well. It means that merchandisers can focus on their sales and promotional responsibilities, instead of wasting time and bandwidth on base-level relevance questions.
Read full review
Wyng
They have a variety of offerings so the best approach is to have a clear idea of what type of results you're looking to achieve. They can offer advice on which modules will help you achieve those goals.
Read full review
Pros
Constructor.io Corporation
  • Optimizes for business KPIs, not string matches, so merchandisers can focus on strategy instead of maintaining a dictionary.
  • Gives merchandisers control to curate the right customer experience per their expert understanding.
  • Customer/technical support during and after implementation.
Read full review
Wyng
  • The cost for Offerpop was what drew me in. I got a lot of bang for my buck.
  • Contests were easy to set up.
  • Linking to products from user generated content was a plus.
Read full review
Cons
Constructor.io Corporation
  • Visibility of the personalization algorithm.
  • Exposing detailed analytics within the customer-facing dashboard.
  • "Top searches" available via API.
Read full review
Wyng
  • My role is mostly involved with social media analytics; measuring campaigns. Offerpop could improve in how they track views. I would like to see the number of views and unique views captured each day versus just the total number of views since the start of the campaign.
  • For our Facebook sign up campaigns, I would like to see more reporting on the information captured in the form fields. For example: the total number of entries, unique entries, bounce rate (how many people viewed the form but didn't complete/submit it).
  • In addition, I would like to see reporting on how some of our questions within the lead form were answered. The number of entrants who selected various options from our drop down lists.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Constructor.io Corporation
No answers on this topic
Wyng
I dont get a lot of great feedback from our social media department. I dont think the issues and concerns where addressed in detail before signing up and before launch
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Constructor.io Corporation
No answers on this topic
Wyng
While Rafflecopter was free to use, I didn't like the bulky box that sat in the middle of our web pages. Wildfire rates were just too high to justify continuing to use them, especially as OfferPop interface was so simple and streamlined
Read full review
Return on Investment
Constructor.io Corporation
No answers on this topic
Wyng
  • We've been able to execute more campaigns internally because of the cost saving.
  • Increased fan acquisition.
  • Engaging experiences for our current customers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wyng Screenshots

Screenshot of Wyng's interface to build digital experiences that collect customer preferences and other zero-party data.Screenshot of Zero-party data collected to deliver highly-relevant experiences across all channels.Screenshot of The Customer preference center that puts customers in control of their data.