Contentstack

Contentstack

Contentstack

27 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Contentstack	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.	N/A

Pricing

Contentstack

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Contentstack
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Contentstack
Considered Both Products	Contentstack Verified User Technician Chose Contentstack Before deciding on Contentstack, we researched some tools, we chose it because of the ease of creating and changing content, the API options for querying content, the ease of modeling new content APIs, high capacity of the CDN to deliver content, ease of integration with other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Contentstack Contentstack is very user-friendly and modern. Incentivized Helpful? BT Brenden Tkach Director of Engineering Chose Contentstack The headless nature of Contentstack and GraphQL makes it engineering-friendly. Incentivized Helpful? MM Matt Madill Directory of Web Development Chose Contentstack Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that … Incentivized Helpful? Richard Bilton Director of Technology Chose Contentstack When we wanted to move to headless we took a look and tested some of the offerings available for headless CMS. Many do have similar features and services and so for us it came down to how Contentstack built a business relationship and service around their clients. We were given … Incentivized Helpful? Tina Lykke Kristensen IT Director Chose Contentstack Featurewise, there's not a lot that separates these CMSs, and it's hard to assess in a SW selection phase exactly how the products stack up against each other. Ultimately, the choice of Contentstack came down to the dialogue with the sales rep. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Contentstack

Security

Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
	Contentstack 7.4 11 Ratings 10% below category average
Role-based user permissions	7.411 Ratings

Platform & Infrastructure

Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
	Contentstack 7.6 10 Ratings 2% below category average
API	8.19 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language	7.08 Ratings

Web Content Creation

Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
	Contentstack 8.1 12 Ratings 4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor	8.12 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness	10.01 Ratings
Admin section	7.712 Ratings
Page templates	7.68 Ratings
Library of website themes	10.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design	6.69 Ratings
Publishing workflow	6.910 Ratings

Web Content Management

Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
	Contentstack 6.4 12 Ratings 15% below category average
Content taxonomy	7.210 Ratings
SEO support	6.510 Ratings
Bulk management	5.89 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions	6.58 Ratings
Community / comment management	6.06 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Contentstack
Small Businesses	ManageWP Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	RWS Tridion Sites Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	RWS Tridion Sites Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Contentstack
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (12 ratings)
Support Rating	8.2 (9 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Contentstack
Likelihood to Recommend	Contentstack Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Contentstack Enables us to build and architect content through the use of their easy to use software and user interface. Customer service has been by far the most reliable and responsive in any vendor i've dealt with. Listens to feedback and builds features and technical improvements that helps customers usability and experience. Incentivized Richard Bilton Director of Technology Read full review
Cons	Contentstack In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion. Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice. Incentivized BT Brenden Tkach Director of Engineering Read full review
Support Rating	Contentstack They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with. Incentivized Alex Tanck VP, Digital Product Management Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Contentstack Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack Incentivized MM matt madill Directory of Web Development Read full review
Return on Investment	Contentstack Saved significant amounts of money that would previously been spent on 3rd party agencies to build websites Empowered Comms teams to create and edit the design and content of their own websites on demand rather than relying on the Dev team Allowed the Development team to concentrate on building functionality rather than websites, so we can focus on improvement rather than BAU work. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots