Control-M vs. Progress MOVEit

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Control-M
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Control-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance.
$29,000
per year
Progress MOVEit
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Progress MOVEit provides a Managed File Transfer (MFT) solution to securely exchange files between applications, internal teams, external customers and business partners. By centralizing file transfer operations, MOVEit improves visibility, control and governance across enterprise data movement. MOVEit supports policy-driven automation for recurring file transfers without requiring advanced programming, while reporting and audit logging provide documented visibility into…N/A
Pricing
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Editions & Modules
On-Premise
Contact Sales
SaaS
Starting at $29,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Considered Both Products
Control-M
Chose Control-M
From my experience, Control-M considered stronger because it has broader third-party integrations, more user-friendly workflows, and easy multi-cloud orchestration. It has no doubt greater flexibility for hybrid environments and broader support for legacy enterprise …
Chose Control-M
Basically, all the products support batch management. The key differentiator of Control-M is the integrated solution (IOA), which makes it easier for users to securely utilize the integrated products.

Basicamente, todos os produtos atendem ao gerenciamento Batch. O principal …
Chose Control-M
Support and high efficiency of the tool when compared to other tools. Also, the integration capabilities with other applications in BMC Control-M surpass all other tools.
Chose Control-M
We chose Control-M because, in our experience, Autosys is more simple but lacks mainframe support
Chose Control-M
Control-M is more flexible and reliable.
Chose Control-M
It was selected to unify the tool used on both mainframe and low-end platforms, and because it is a market leader and offers features and conveniences that the other tool did not have.
Chose Control-M
Control-M is more complete and manages loads that exceed 24 hours.

O controle-m e mais complete e gerenciar Cargas que ultrapassem 24 horas
Chose Control-M
MFT (managed file transfer) is a product that is widely used within the company.

O MFT é um produto muito usado dentro da empresa
Chose Control-M
Control-M is generally considered superior to AutoSys for organizations requiring a centralized, cloud-forward, and developer-friendly orchestration platform. While AutoSys remains a robust choice for on-premises batch processing, Control-M excels in hybrid multicloud …
Chose Control-M
It supports both on-prem and cloud environments.
Easy to handle complex, multi-system workflows more efficiently.
Helped reduce manual intervention, which has decreased errors and operational costs.
Chose Control-M
Jenkins is a user-friendly tool, but it doesn't offer the same blend of features that Control-M has. Often, Jenkins jobs become stuck, but Control-M typically doesn't; instead, it generates an alert to the designated email recipient. In the case of production, this act is so …
Chose Control-M
There are more qualified professionals in control-m compared to control-m, which has more plugins and is constantly updated.
Chose Control-M
APX is extremely easy to use and scheduling offers more possibilities and dependencies are better managed than in Control-M. We had to replace APX because we run processing under kubernetes and APX does not natively offer this possibility

APX est extrêmement simple d'utilisation …
Chose Control-M
Control-M is more user-friendly, has many more automation processes, and many processes can be performed in parallel.
Chose Control-M
We need end to end automation, so using Control-M we can achieve this but by using Azure automation it automates data pipelines across the cloud. Compared to Autosys, Control-M has more advanced and modern UI and simple job life cycle management. When compared with apache …
Progress MOVEit
Chose Progress MOVEit
MOVEit Transfer handles our customers' uploads with the exception of customers who upload large files. We have found Signiant to be a much better solution for large files whereas MOVEit Transfer continue to manage the overwhelming majority of our customer data.
Chose Progress MOVEit
MOVEit automation is configured easily and safely along with a great UI compared to others. We rely on MOVEit to provide the transmission of daily, weekly, and monthly files fast. Not only can this configuration be done locally, but also through a browser.
Chose Progress MOVEit
We previously used Attunity MFT (Formerly Repliweb MFT); We were looking to move away from the platform becuase, while flexible, it was too flexible. The flexibility was gained by running scripts with each job to do what you want. So, not only did you have to define the job …
Chose Progress MOVEit
I haven't used many other file transfer automation software unless it was code I wrote in a bash, batch, vb, C# or powershell script. I can confidently say that if presented with another product I wouldn't move away from MOVEit. The system if very solid and feature rich.
Chose Progress MOVEit
We've been using MOVEIt for years and after several assessments, we felt that it was an unnecessary cost and lift to try and move away from the platform, given that it was meeting all of our current business needs. As the company grows, we will continue to assess whether MOVEIt …
Chose Progress MOVEit
We started using Box a while ago and we are thinking of exchanging MOVEit with Box when it comes to customer and suppliers file transfers. However, there is some reticence in doing that right now, our IT feels more comfortable form the security point of view with MOVEit. …
Chose Progress MOVEit
Price point was a big reason. Ipswitch MOVEit has a lower initial price point than may of the other software options.
Features
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Control-M
9.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Progress MOVEit
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

DataMotion
DataMotion
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.8 out of 10
DataMotion
DataMotion
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Control-MProgress MOVEit
Likelihood to Recommend
Control-M processes about 10,000 jobs starting every day in our production environment, and adding new jobs is very simple. We don't feel any pressure on Control-M because it is processing multiple jobs in parallel. As a developer, I created an account in the BMC community to get help and support. We post there rarely because sometimes we need solutions very quickly and don't have time to connect with the guys on the Control-M help desk. If BMC adds more videos or notes on scenario-based content, then it will be more helpful.
Read full review
Its exceptional at moving files from their source to various destinations and integrates well with the MoveIt Transfer piece. I have over 250 tasks defined in MoveIt to automate file movements from all different areas of business. I wouldn't recommend MoveIt if you need to do some advanced file parsing / maniuplation. While it does do basic manipulations, there are easier ways to do it.
Read full review
Pros
  • Workload change manager is one of our favorite features of this product. It enforces standards, which is a huge benefit. Users don't just make crazy changes that cause issues with other jobs. It does great promotions from one environment to another, transforming all the data to match the next environment.
Read full review
  • Ipswitch MOVEit is very easy to use. Once a user logs into the website they can send a package or email to an other user or someone outside the organization. This has a similar look and feel to a web based email service.
  • For users that are not part of our organization Ipswitch MOVEit effortlessly can create a new account and provide that users with an email and activation instructions. IT does not need to be involved with setting up users.
  • Temporary users are controlled by a policy that will disable and remove accounts based on setting set by administrators. This is a great way to make sure old accounts are removed when not used.
Read full review
Cons
  • I haven't come across too many spots where I'm not happy with the product. Most of the shortfalls were in my knowledge of the product as opposed to the actual product. Currently we're having a little bit of an issue with the deployment of the software to the servers, but it's more of an "us" problem than a product problem. I can't really give any good examples of shortfalls of the product that I've found so far.
Read full review
  • High-Availability features aren't very dependable
  • Version upgrades have caused significant issues (PGP keyring corrupted)
  • MOVEit Transfer does not handle larger files very well
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is one of the best solutions on the market, in terms of innovation, reliability and stability. Control-M provides security when used by the largest companies in Mexico such as banks, department stores and logistics. It has proven to be able to integrate with new technologies on the market and provide almost 100% availability, thanks to its automatic FailOver scheme.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It has an excellent graphical user interface and robust functionalities, which any scheduling tool currently has in the current market. Strengthening security measures, such as role-based access control and encryption, is essential to protect sensitive data. Providing tools to optimize resource utilization and reduce costs would be valuable. Limited options for customizing the user interface can hinder productivity. Allowing users to tailor the interface to their needs would enhance the experience.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Secondary Instances: Control-M supports the installation of a secondary instance of the entire Control-M environment, Control-M/EM, or Control-M/Server.Automatic & Manual Failover: In case of a failure on the primary host, Control-M can automatically failover to the secondary host if using Oracle or MSSQL databases. Manual failover is also an option, enabling a controlled switch during planned maintenance.Fallback: After resolving the issue on the primary host, you can easily fall back to it, or even designate the secondary host as the new primary. Database Replication: For high availability, Control-M leverages database replication from the primary site to a disaster recovery site. While replication is essential, its implementation and maintenance are the user's responsibility.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
good page load times, efficient report completion, and minimal impact on integrated systems. Specifically, the well-designed GUI contributes to a positive user experience, and the platform's ability to automate various stages of the workflow, including Big Data processes, is highlighted as a key strength. Fast Page Loads: Control-M is reported to have a responsive user interface with fast page load times, allowing users to quickly navigate and manage their workflows
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
He contactado varias veces con el soporte de BMC y ha sido bastante bueno, siempre han sabido darme una solución a lo que he pedido. Esta vez quiero hacer alguna nueva pregunta, pero no se si se me podrá contestar, ya que es algo que tal vez fuera de otro rango y no pertenezca a ellos.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Very knowledgeable instructors provide a hands-on, collaborative learning experience and can interact directly with instructors to develop our Control-M skills. This format allows for immediate feedback, in-depth discussions, and tailored guidance, leading to a deeper understanding of Control-M concepts and practical application. Face-to-face interaction fosters higher engagement and a more dynamic learning environment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Simple and easy to use web based, well paced. Available any time. All online courses are simple and easy to access and use. Very practical everyday use scenarios and solutions. Incorporates software simulations, learning games, and built-in assessments to enhance comprehension and engagement. Online subscriptions are regularly updated with the latest product information, ensuring users have access to the most current knowledge.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
As HA we have depend on the external DB, why don't we have HA feasibility with embedded DB. As with external DB, there are performance issues and fine tuning the DB. As if its embedded DB, Control-M it self take care of the functionality.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Jenkins is a user-friendly tool, but it doesn't offer the same blend of features that Control-M has. Often, Jenkins jobs become stuck, but Control-M typically doesn't; instead, it generates an alert to the designated email recipient. In the case of production, this act is so quick
Read full review
MOVEit automation is configured easily and safely along with a great UI compared to others. We rely on MOVEit to provide the transmission of daily, weekly, and monthly files fast. Not only can this configuration be done locally, but also through a browser.
Read full review
Scalability
awesome product.Control-M delivers advanced operational capabilities easily consumed by Dev, Ops, data teams, and lines of business.Control-M Workflow InsightsApplication and data workflow observability: Increased confidence that SLAs are being met for Control-M users and IT leadersComprehensive control and management capabilities: Enhanced dashboards and reporting with constant telemetry and intelligent analysis on executing workflowsSelf-service visibility: In-depth reporting to help teams work autonomously
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Since centralizing all our workflows in Control-M, we've cut end to end processing time by nearly 30%
  • Before Control-M we were babysitting scripts, manually rerunning failed jobs, and chasing ghost errors. With automated recovery, smart notifications, and fewer failures slipping through the cracks, we have saved 3 hours a day across teams
  • Our workflows success rate sits at 99.95% and when things do fail, they are pinpointed immediately
Read full review
  • Everything has been positive. It has limited the need to code for file transfers or manually move files which has in turn granted users more time to focus on other tasks.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress MOVEit Screenshots

Screenshot of MOVEit AnalyticsScreenshot of MOVEit Automated ReportingScreenshot of MOVEit Data ConsolidationScreenshot of MOVEit AuditsScreenshot of MOVEit TransfersScreenshot of MOVEit Visibility and Control