TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. IBM Sterling Order Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AThe Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform, including technology from the former Determine Selectica CPQ solution acquired by Corcentric in April 2019, is designed to provide a customizable CPQ solution to cover an enterprise's need to offer many possible permutations of combinations of product and service in a streamlined fashion.N/A

    IBM Sterling Order Management

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM now owns and supports Sterling Commerce products (since August 2010), the most notable product being IBM Order Management. The platform emphasizes order promising and fulfillment and provides tools to adaptively complete orders specified to customer demands.N/A
    Pricing
    Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformIBM Sterling Order Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformIBM Sterling Order Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformIBM Sterling Order Management
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Webgility
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformIBM Sterling Order Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.4
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformIBM Sterling Order Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Corcentric
    It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
    Read full review
    IBM
    It's perfect for medium to large retailers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Corcentric
    • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
    • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
    • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Centralizing data.
    • Instantaneously updated data.
    • Ad hoc reporting.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Corcentric
    • Model builder's sluggishness.
    Read full review
    IBM
    • RCP Based deployment
    • Wider variety of sourcing configuration
    • Product Documentation
    • COM Features need to better so that Customer case handling is facilitated
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Corcentric
    Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
    Read full review
    IBM
    The package of Sterling Order Management / Sterling Store / Sterling Call Center works very well and it supports the expansion to Geographies like US/EU/JP/China, some of hottest markets for e-commerce.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Corcentric
    I used Saleslogix.
    Read full review
    IBM
    Warehouse Management System which is mainly focussed on warehouse fulfillment but not on the routing and availability tracking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Corcentric
    • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
    • reduced sales cycle.
    • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Optimal inventory management resulted in more orders per minute and good ROI and customer experience
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots