CoSchedule provides a content calendar, content optimization, and contentmarketing products, with users among 50,000 marketers worldwide, helping them organize their work, deliver projects on time, and prove marketing team value.
N/A
OpenAsset
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenAsset is a DAM tailored for AEC & Real Estate from the company of the same name in New York. A cloud-based Digital Asset Management designed for managing digital assets by property or project.
N/A
Pricing
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
OpenAsset
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
OpenAsset
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
OpenAsset
Features
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
OpenAsset
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
7.3
1 Ratings
8% below category average
OpenAsset
-
Ratings
Ideation
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
23% above category average
OpenAsset
-
Ratings
Content distribution
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
OpenAsset
-
Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content performance analytics
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
-
Ratings
OpenAsset
3.0
1 Ratings
81% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Content analytics
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
DAM Features
Comparison of DAM Features features of Product A and Product B
CoSchedule is great for businesses or agencies who need an overview of all their marketing efforts, and who want to establish collaboration between multiple departments. The calendar view is one of the best we've worked with and makes it easy to see exactly what's happening. There is some slight clunkiness when it comes to admin-related tasks, and a few things aren't easy to find, but there's great support.
If you tag your items with keywords correctly, it is a great resource for quickly finding the digital assets you want. I had meticulously gone through all of our digital assets adding keywords for several categories which made searching for specific items very quick and easy, as well as relevant. OpenAsset is also great for automating the creation of PowerPoint presentations and data sheets. It is a project-based software meaning it works best for those in the AEC industry that sort and store digital assets based on the projects to which they are associated. If you are in a marketing firm or other non-project-based business model then another DAM system would likely work better for you.
The platform seems sluggish as of late, likely as a result of the robust amount of data we are entering and the number of filters we're creating.
Social media scheduling exists, but we do run into publishing errors more often then we'd like.
Task templates when updated are not retroactive, so when you create projects for an entire year and then change a template, you need to go back and change them manually.
You can create an album to share with those outside of your firm, but the only way to do this is to download files into a zip file. This is antiquated thinking. It would be much better if you could create an album that would generate a temporary web page that anyone outside of the organization could view by clicking on a link.
There are a number of legacy items that are no longer functional. OpenAsset needs to either make these functional or remove the options.
The interface is very intuitive, from setting up social profiles, to posting, to tags, to optimizing for best day/time to post. It's super easy to scan the aggregate analytics. The calendar is very easy to grok at a glance, and the more advanced functionality is intuitive to set up.
I didn't have to use their official support, but I can say that they put out a lot of content online to help users. Their YouTube page has quite an array of tutorial videos explaining how things work and how to get the most out of their tools. If you're struggling, before picking up a phone or blasting off an email, try searching for your problem on YouTube or their forums.
CoSchedule provides collaborative planning of projects. The calendar view is very well designed. Meetings and tasks can be scheduled and tracked easily. Whatever is being done, no matter how big the task/project is, it gives a bird-eye view of everything. Additionally, it also integrated very well with WordPress. Their customer service team is also very helpful.
I have evaluated MediaValet on a couple of occasions. It is a much more budget-friendly system that is not necessarily project-specific in its architecture. It is much more general in nature in the industries it can target. OpenAsset's integration with Deltek Vantagepoint is a big selling point if you have both of those applications. If you don't have Vantagepoint, MediaValet might be a good alternative to consider.
It has saved me about 1 hour per day to keep things organized from Asana to WordPress.
By not having a functioning Google Doc import feature, it costs me about 30 minutes for each blog post to copy paste all the content, images, etc.
By bundling too many features into their plans, many of which we don't use (e.g. social media scheduling), we lose a little ROI because we are not using the full feature set. We use and prefer Buffer for social media, so when CoSchedule raised their price $40+ per month on features we would not be using, that hurt.