TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cursor

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ACursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.

    $20

    per month

    Google Gemini

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Gemini is a natively multimodal agentic platform designed to synthesize and act upon data across text, image, audio, and video modalities. It serves as a centralized intelligence layer that integrates across the Google Workspace ecosystem and Android/ChromeOS platforms to perform autonomous, multi-step tasks.N/A
    Pricing
    CursorGoogle Gemini
    Editions & Modules
    Pro
    $20
    per month
    Teams
    $40
    per month per user
    Pro+
    $60
    per month
    Ultra
    $200
    per month
    Enterprise
    Custom
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CursorGoogle Gemini
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsEvery plan includes a set amount of model usage. Additional usage is based on the models and features used. The Bugbot add-on is available at $40 per month, per user, or with Custom pricing for Enterprise customers. A discount is available for annual billing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CursorGoogle Gemini
    Considered Both Products
    SpaceX
    No answer on this topic
    Google
    Chose Google Gemini
    I like the UI of Google Gemini way more, and I also love the inbuilt integrations it has with open google docs and sheets. ChatGPT does not have (AFAIK) a Deep research section.
    Google Gemini Gems is also an awesome addition which helps to automate mundane/repetitive tasks. I …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    19 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    17 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    13 Answers
    User Ratings
    CursorGoogle Gemini
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (10 ratings)
    8.6
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.2
    (10 ratings)
    9.1
    (18 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CursorGoogle Gemini
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SpaceX
    Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Gemini is fantastic for receiving quick answers to questions where accuracy is not paramount. It is great for brainstorming ideas. It is also fantastic for analysing large swathes of unformatted data and finding correlations. Gemini can also transcribe handwriting and audio files making it excellent for formative assessment. It can also now create Google Slides which is great for lesson planning. Gemini is only as good as the prompts you provide it with though so you must remember to be exact with your prompts to get the best outputs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SpaceX
    • API creation.
    • Integrations
    • Plan mode for large tasks.
    • Refactoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • The new image editing functionality surprised me
    • In general, file loading is better than in other AI programs
    • I think it's somewhat faster than other AI programs, or at least that's the impression it usually gives
    • Features like canvas and deep research are very interesting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SpaceX
    • The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP.
    • It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost.
    • Support can be unresponsive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Faces in generated images can be kind of scary looking, deformed.
    • When asking for specific text in an image, it often generates funky randomly spelled text instead.
    • Tried a bulk image search with uploaded png files to find the same images online and the links it provided were 404 errors instead.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SpaceX
    Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SpaceX
    Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    It's standard usability interface - no problems or challenges using it. I do prefer Claude still because of the different options/modes you can toggle on and off. I don't think Gemini has those options. It's a great daily companion for quick problem solving but not great for larger projects or conversations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SpaceX
    graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Gemini seems very simple to use, veyr similar to ChatGPT, I wish they did have a capability such as ChatGPT projects one, so one can separate topics easily, it's very customizable, where I believe it defeats the others is that, is already very simple to use all of Google ecosystem, such as Drive, docs, sheets and else
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SpaceX
    • Development speed increased at least 25%
    • The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
    • We use it as a standard now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Free way to gain another team member
    • Helps me be more efficient and overcome blocks in my workflow
    • Speeds up my ability to update our website's calendar by easily double if not more
    • Allows me to dabble in areas that I have no expertise in such as coding
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots