Crunchbase vs. Databook

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Crunchbase
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Crunchbase is a provider of private-company prospecting and research solutions. The vendor boasts that over 60 million users—including salespeople, entrepreneurs, investors, and market researchers—use Crunchbase to prospect for new business opportunities, and that companies all over the world rely on Crunchbase to power their applications, making over 3 billion calls to their API each year.
$0
Databook
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Databook’s main enterprise intelligence platform helps market teams quickly understand customers.N/A
Pricing
CrunchbaseDatabook
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Crunchbase Starter
$29
per month, per user
Crunchbase Pro
$49
per month, per user
Crunchbase Enterprise
Custom Billing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CrunchbaseDatabook
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CrunchbaseDatabook
Considered Both Products
Crunchbase
Chose Crunchbase
It has more data and it's for sure more accurate, Crunchbase has a better platform when talking about visual and it's also easier to search. Also, it has better filters which can help companies to dive deeper into researching accordingly to their needs
Chose Crunchbase
I like Pitchbook a lot -- but too expensive for a slight difference in our use case. If Crunchbase added valuation "estimates" (kind of like zillow "zestimates"), it would be awesome instead of just very good.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is cheaper and the overall price/value balance is better
Chose Crunchbase
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides …
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is definitely bottom of the barrel in this space. At similar pricing models, all competitors I have tried have significantly bigger and more updated databases. Crunchbase may have been great sometime in the past, but they are not worth engaging now.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase is the best resource for prospecting startups hands down. TechTarget has a lot of useful info, but I found it to be inaccurate where it mattered most. Crunchbase's data seems more accurate, and is also easier to use. Not the most exact comparison, but they offer …
Chose Crunchbase
Sales Navigator is better only because it provides you with more direct contacts to reach out to. Crunchbase only tells you really the top dogs in the company like c-level execs, not necessarily contacts that you would be having sales conversations with.
Chose Crunchbase
Crunchbase has far more company data than LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The thing that it lacks is data on the people at those companies. LinkedIn Sales Navigator also has a better CRM integration, from what I understand. It is more automated. For our strategy, we use both of these …
Chose Crunchbase
This question always gets me. In a world with so many database solutions, it becomes quite difficult to compare, its the subtleties. Bigger is usually better...Crunchbase has gone through over 300...300 rounds of funding. In a world where there are so many options, going with …
Chose Crunchbase
I have found that Crunchbase has more up-to-date information when comparing ZoomInfo and EverString.
Chose Crunchbase
I don't know of other services like Crunchbase, in my mind it stands alone. Of course I could use FormDs, but it's cumbersome and doesn't provide the same level of information, so I rarely use it.
Databook
Chose Databook
Databook stood out because the research layer felt deeper and more strategic. It surfaces context you don’t usually get from tools like ZoomInfo or Lusha, which are great for contact data but not for understanding a company’s priorities. I used those more often because they …
Features
CrunchbaseDatabook
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Databook
-
Ratings
Advanced search4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Identification of new leads7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
List quality4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
List upload/download9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Load time/data access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
5.1
Ratings
41% below category average
Databook
-
Ratings
Contact information3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Company information6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Industry information5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
5.8
Ratings
25% below category average
Databook
-
Ratings
Lead qualification process5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Salesforce integration5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Company/business profiles5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data hygiene4.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Tags5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
Crunchbase
4.3
Ratings
54% below category average
Databook
-
Ratings
Sales email templates4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Append emails to records4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CrunchbaseDatabook
Small Businesses
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mediafly
Mediafly
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.3 out of 10
LeanData
LeanData
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Clari
Clari
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CrunchbaseDatabook
Likelihood to Recommend
4.7
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
3.6
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CrunchbaseDatabook
Likelihood to Recommend
The data is outdated and has significant gaps. It is mostly a replication of what is easily and publicly available, with little value added. Their predatory subscription model includes no notice of renewal and they are very antagonistic towards their customers.
Read full review
Well Suited - Databook works well when you’re in a sales role focused on enterprise accounts. You often need a full view of a company’s priorities, financials, and strategic themes, and the tool gives you that context quickly without digging through multiple sources. Less Appropriate - It’s less useful when you’re working mid market or with fast growing smaller companies. The coverage and depth can be limited, so you may not find enough meaningful data to rely on. In those cases, manual research still ends up doing most of the work.
Read full review
Pros
  • Account-Based Data. Employee range, website, industry, company description, chief executives, latest news, etc. All for the given company you are researching.
  • Salesforce integration. I have not used it, but the functionality is supposed to be great. You can run data enrichment in your CRM with the Crunchbase data.
  • Funding, mergers, and acquisitions data. Crunchbase has relationships with thousands of VC firms throughout the world and followup with each very regularly to be able to serve up the latest data to their users.
  • Tech integrations. Integrations with tools like Bombora, Builtwith, Siftery, and others are really useful because you can use Crunchbase's company profile-based research method, and see the data from these tools specifically related to the given company.
Read full review
  • Growth drivers
  • Competitor Info
  • Time Saving Research
  • Earning calls Details
Read full review
Cons
  • Notifications - Something similar to TweetDeck would be nice, so that when news breaks it could be an immediate fact.
  • Honestly dont add too much because you don't want it to become more of a social tool with cluttered info, keep it straight to the point.
Read full review
  • it lacked coverage to smaller businesses and Start-ups
  • Sometimes acts as "one more research tool"
Read full review
Usability
In our experience, the customer service is horrible to non existent. If we were a fortune 100 company with a staff of computer people I am sure this would be a valuable service as they would "speak the language" but that is not us. Not being able to reach customer service when we are thinking about upgrading is, in my opinion, a crazy business model.
Read full review
I rated it a seven because the core insights are genuinely useful once you get to them, but the workflow isn’t always smooth. Finding the right accounts can be hit or miss and some sections feel a bit cluttered, so it takes time to get comfortable. When it works, it saves effort, but the experience could be more intuitive
Read full review
Support Rating
They give standard answers. They are not a customer first business. I tried to cancel my subscription after using it for only 1 week as we found the information was outdated and not at all useful. But they would not cancel the year long subscription I mistakenly signed up for
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ptichbook. This platform is more detailed and has a lot more information regarding round details. The platform also has other features to build lists, market maps, landscapes and access reports and raw data about companies by vertical or any other segmentation. Also provides emails on c-suite. Crunchbase however is an easier tool to use so if complicated segmentation is not required, Crunchabse is a great solution. It's also super fast to access and provides a succinct and easy to read profile view.
Read full review
Databook stood out because the research layer felt deeper and more strategic. It surfaces context you don’t usually get from tools like ZoomInfo or Lusha, which are great for contact data but not for understanding a company’s priorities. I used those more often because they serve broader use cases and are available in most orgs, but Databook delivered a different type of insight when I needed a clearer narrative about an account.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Crunchbase has enabled my company to be more efficient in determining whether or not to conduct further diligence on companies.
  • Tailoring searches for certain criteria has been helpful for aggregating competitors and companies of similar profiles.
  • The software is not only powerful, but also affordable!
Read full review
  • Positive RoI - Quicker meetings because of better conversation insights
  • Negative RoI - The tool would be helpful in enterprise setup, hence wasnt useful for commercial hunting
Read full review
ScreenShots