Databricks Data Intelligence Platform vs. DBeaver

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Databricks offers the Databricks Lakehouse Platform (formerly the Unified Analytics Platform), a data science platform and Apache Spark cluster manager. The Databricks Unified Data Service provides a platform for data pipelines, data lakes, and data platforms.
$0.07
Per DBU
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
DBeaver offers comprehensive data management tools designed to help teams explore, process, and administrate SQL, NoSQL, and cloud data sources. DBeaver is available commercially as DBeaver PRO and for free as DBeaver Community.
$11
per month per user
Pricing
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Editions & Modules
Standard
$0.07
Per DBU
Premium
$0.10
Per DBU
Enterprise
$0.13
Per DBU
Lite Edition Subscription
$11
per month per user
Enterprise Edition Subscription
$25
per month per user
Lite Edition License
$110
per year per user
Enterprise Edition License
$250
per year per user
Ultimate Edition License
$500
per year per user
CloudBeaver Enterprise
$1,000
per year per 5 users
DBeaver Team Edition
$1,280
per year per 1 administrator and 2 developers
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for multi-user licenses.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Features
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
DBeaver
7.3
11 Ratings
15% below category average
Version control tools00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Test data generation00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Performance optimization tools00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Schema maintenance00 Ratings8.49 Ratings
Database change management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
Databricks Data Intelligence Platform
-
Ratings
DBeaver
5.5
9 Ratings
38% below category average
User management00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Database security00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Database status reporting00 Ratings4.07 Ratings
Change management00 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Sequel Pro
Sequel Pro
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.7 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(18 ratings)
9.0
(10 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(4 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(2 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Databricks Data Intelligence PlatformDBeaver
Likelihood to Recommend
Databricks
Medium to Large data throughput shops will benefit the most from Databricks Spark processing. Smaller use cases may find the barrier to entry a bit too high for casual use cases. Some of the overhead to kicking off a Spark compute job can actually lead to your workloads taking longer, but past a certain point the performance returns cannot be beat.
Read full review
DBeaver
If you are connecting to Snowflake and want to query from your laptop, I find that this is much easier to use than Snowflake's IDE. It allows us as a business intelligence team to more easily connect to our servers, and code with much less hassle. It would be less appropriate if you are only on an on-premises SQL server, in that case, I would just use SSMS.
Read full review
Pros
Databricks
  • Process raw data in One Lake (S3) env to relational tables and views
  • Share notebooks with our business analysts so that they can use the queries and generate value out of the data
  • Try out PySpark and Spark SQL queries on raw data before using them in our Spark jobs
  • Modern day ETL operations made easy using Databricks. Provide access mechanism for different set of customers
Read full review
DBeaver
  • Identify types of DB connections by color code: development, testing and production.
  • Predictive typing, it is incredibly accurate and saves me a lot of time.
  • Jump between different simultaneous DB connections.
  • Navigate through the schema object tree.
  • Provide all the tools I need in one window.
Read full review
Cons
Databricks
  • Sometimes, when multiple jobs depend on each other in different environments, it is not always easy to see the full workflow in one place.
  • It is sometimes difficult to determine which job or cluster contributes more to the overall cost.
  • For beginners, cluster configuration may be a little difficult. So more recommendation in the platform can help.
Read full review
DBeaver
  • Schema editing is not very intuitive. Editing a single column forces you into multiple tab windows when trying to change something simple like a column name.
  • Sorting and filtering in data is nice, but buried in long right-click menus.
  • Some things are definitely non-standard UI for a Windows application, so it might be hard for die-hard Windows fans to get used to.
Read full review
Usability
Databricks
Because it is an amazing platform for designing experiments and delivering a deep dive analysis that requires execution of highly complex queries, as well as it allows to share the information and insights across the company with their shared workspaces, while keeping it secured.

in terms of graph generation and interaction it could improve their UI and UX
Read full review
DBeaver
It's perfectly easy to use. Not super new and shiny with lots of accessibility tailored tools, but does the job
Read full review
Support Rating
Databricks
One of the best customer and technology support that I have ever experienced in my career. You pay for what you get and you get the Rolls Royce. It reminds me of the customer support of SAS in the 2000s when the tools were reaching some limits and their engineer wanted to know more about what we were doing, long before "data science" was even a name. Databricks truly embraces the partnership with their customer and help them on any given challenge.
Read full review
DBeaver
Not a lot of users have DBeaver so fewer resources are available online to help you if you have any issues. When I was trying to figure out how to create my own ER diagrams, it was a little tough to find resources
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Databricks
The most important differentiating factor for Databricks Lakehouse Platform from these other platforms is support for ACID transactions and the time travel feature. Also, native integration with managed MLflow is a plus. EMR, Cloudera, and Hortonworks are not as optimized when it comes to Spark Job Execution. Other platforms need to be self-managed, which is another huge hassle.
Read full review
DBeaver
MySQL workbench from MySQL only supports MySQL databases and it only provides basic functionality. On top of that, the user experience could be quite confusing for first-time users. SSMS from SQL server doesn't support inline editing nicely. The view for inline editing and view data is different, making it uncomfortable to use. All in all, DBeaver is the best tool when you manage a lot of databases with different types.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Databricks
  • The ability to spin up a BIG Data platform with little infrastructure overhead allows us to focus on business value not admin
  • DB has the ability to terminate/time out instances which helps manage cost.
  • The ability to quickly access typical hard to build data scenarios easily is a strength.
Read full review
DBeaver
  • Positive Ability to manage DBeaver and query ad-hoc quickly
  • By having the queries saved it has saved developer time and thereby increased the ROI on the investment on the tool
  • This has made firefighting quicker and freed up resources for more development work.
Read full review
ScreenShots