Datadog vs. IBM Confluent
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Datadog | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Datadog is a monitoring service for IT, Dev and Ops teams who write and run applications at scale, and want to turn the massive amounts of data produced by their apps, tools and services into actionable insight. | $18 per month per host |
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual pricing. Multi-Year/Volume discounts available (500+ hosts/mo). | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
93% Delivers good value for the price 41 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 52 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 32 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 36 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring Tasks |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Management Tasks |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon CloudWatch Score7.8 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | LogicMonitor Score8.9 out of 10 | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ManageEngine Site24x7 Score10 out of 10 | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 4.3 | - |
| Usability | 8.7 | - |
| Support Rating | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 1.0 | - |
| Datadog | IBM Confluent | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Datadog Screenshots |






