TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Dell Avamar

    Score5.7 out of 10
    N/ADell Avamar is a hardware and software data backup and deduplication product. It provides protection and recovery through a complete software and hardware solution when paired with Dell Data Domain for virtual environments, remote offices, enterprise apps, NAS servers, and desktops/laptops.N/A

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AHPE 3PAR StoreServ is a flash storage option, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
    Pricing
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Considered Both Products
    Dell Technologies
    No answer on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    57%
    Would buy again
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    57%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    57%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    60%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    3 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    67%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Dell Avamar and HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Feature
    Dell Avamar
    6.6
    23 Ratings
    24% below category average
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ
    -
    Ratings
    Universal recovery8.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant recovery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recovery verification7.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business application protection8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations7.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud3.610 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression8.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Snapshots5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment4.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management dashboard2.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform support8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Retention options8.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Small Businesses
    BDRShield
    Score6.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
    Score9.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.0
    (23 ratings)
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    2.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Dell AvamarHPE 3PAR StoreServ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Dell Technologies
    This software is well suited for companies that want to be very in control of their backups but need a simple tool. It could be convenient for them to just buy their own node, locate it in a different location, and set up the jobs for their machines to backup to the cloud with the specific plugins. However, it would not be convenient for companies looking to have a tool that needs to be secure and compliant, and that need to have different other options for business continuity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a great storage device for both file and block-level storage needs. You can use it in place of SAN devices required by database servers. It provides an amazing compaction ratio and, hence, reduces overall storage footprint and cost. This is, however, slightly costly if your environment doesn't really see high transactions most of the time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Dell Technologies
    • Avamar performs data deduplication on the remote host. This greatly reduces the amount of traffic that each backup requires. This even applies to the virtual environment through change block tracking. Backup times are reduced from hours to minutes.
    • The management interface makes it easy to configure and maintain data retention periods. Many times certain data must be kept for an extended period of time. There is a specific menu for managing retention periods.
    • The system is able to recover itself from a hard failure with virtually no loss of backups. There is a checkpoint taken each day that provides a recovery point in the event of a catastrophic failure. Since this is a node based system, the loss of more than one node could require a recovery be performed.
    • While another grid must be purchased, the replication utility allows all backups to be replicated to another grid at a remote location. This ensures the resilience of the backups in the event there is the loss of the primary data center.
    • Also works on HCI devices performing image-level backups as in our primary data center environment
    • There is also now an All-in-One appliance for smaller locations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We are using HP 3PAR storeServ 8200 for both our file level and block level storage.
    • I really love the amazing compaction ratio provided by HP 3PAR. Some of our disks have compaction ratio above 25:1, which is super amazing. You can definitely look for around 75% reduction of storage footprints.
    • It has a great user friendly web console "SSMC"(StoreServ Management Console). This is an additional bonus and can be used by even non-storage people like DBA and Network to take a look at storage performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Dell Technologies
    • The client interface has constant JAVA issues and can be slow and chunky. We have often had issues with current versions of JAVA breaking it so it will not even run.
    • The backup clients are split out for function. Although this makes them light, it also makes it cumbersome to upgrade clients. The naming scheme can also be confusing for the clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • The system requires a physical or virtual system to manage upgrades and patches and for call home features. Most other systems have this integrated into the array. Just another piece of infrastructure to manage.
    • There are some system jobs that come pre-scheduled in the initial setup, but there is at least 1 job that should be added to this by default. When you delete storage, you also need to run a job to compact the CPG (a group where the luns all reside) to reclaim the previously used storage as free. This should be done by default at least monthly in the background.
    • There are 2 different GUI front ends that can still be used. The older version (3 PAR management console) is being phased out (has been for 3 years).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Dell Technologies
    I have been using the product for over five years. This has performed so well that with the current system reaching its End-of-Life with EMC next year, I have proposed replacing it with the latest version of the product. Now that it integrates with Data Domain, the cost has been greatly reduced. Instead of the need to purchase many nodes, one Data Domain can replace them creating a significant cost savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We are very satisfied with 3PAR performance and especially the IOPS (Input Output Per Second) is pretty amazing. It is easy to configure and doesn't require much knowledge of storage for Tier 1 support team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Dell Technologies
    The system overall is easy to monitor and see your backup/restore status. The user interface could use updating as it relies on Java and any updates to Java cause the interface to stop working need to be reinstalled
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Dell Technologies
    Support is very convincing, always eager to solve issues from the root rather than workaround, don't hesitate to take webex, describe the issues to the core and recommend configuration to avoid further issues. We can ask few questions other than the main issue. They don't hesitate to answer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    With their phone home technology, we usually have a replacement part on its way by the time we wake up in the morning, or if the event occurs overnight. We have had great support when we had questions or events that required a call.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Dell Technologies
    Avamar has simplied the back up approach in their VE edition and is much easier to use than Data Protector. Backing up multiple VMs takes minutes instead of hours now. Creating policies, retentions, and schedules, is vastly improved and much easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We still use NetApp storage enclosures at each plant for our routine file shares (CIFS) but I would love to swap them out for the HPE 3PARs as we use for our ERP app data. The 3PARS are simply faster and much better at near-instant replication. But even more importantly we can get the reporting that we need from the 3PAR within a few minutes, even custom reports. 3PARs are much easier to manage than NetApps in general and I think that the only place that they compete is in compaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Dell Technologies
    • Absolute Zero ROI
    • This appliance does not work in its current state and to update we need to wait 2-3 months
    • Can't wait to get rid of it and replace it with something else. (not even sure if we will be able to get it running before that)
    • [I think] this is one of the worst mistakes we made
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • We grew unexpectedly, which forced us to buy a lot of expensive HP SSD's.
    • We have never had any performance issues with this storage.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots