DemandScience vs. UserGems

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
UserGems
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
UserGems is a pipeline generation platform for go-to-market teams. Its AI agents automatically surface high-intent buyers, prioritize them, and deploy personalized outbound and ABM to drive more pipeline at scale.N/A
Pricing
DemandScienceUserGems
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceUserGems
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
DemandScienceUserGems
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.8
17 Ratings
5% above category average
UserGems
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting8.617 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard7.210 Ratings00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.8
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Customer interaction histories00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Syndicated content00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Personalization00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Engagement data tracking00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
36% below category average
Ad campaign creation00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Display advertising00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Contextual advertising00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Social advertising00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
35% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
UserGems
5.0
1 Ratings
32% below category average
3rd party intent signals00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Downstream intent signals00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Account identification00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
UserGems
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Automated workflow & orchestration00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceUserGems
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Dealfront
Dealfront
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conductor
Conductor
Score 9.5 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceUserGems
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.9
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(69 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceUserGems
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
UserGems
- win back campaigns - low hanging fruit outreach, where the prospect is already familiar with our product - connecting us to leads who are directly within our ICP and based on a recent new hire or promotion, are likely to be in the market for a product like ours
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
UserGems
No answers on this topic
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
UserGems
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
UserGems
No answers on this topic
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
UserGems
Because it's well automated, it's very easy to use for our scope. However, because it's so automated, at times I feel like I'm not getting the full picture. I also feel like there should be more training for admin in their actual platform. Even though they help us set up the automations, more training on using the platform might empower us to better understand how to get more out of the platform.
Read full review
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
UserGems
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
UserGems
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
UserGems
UserGems gives us the most relevant data specifically as it comes to job changes
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
UserGems
  • has given us a better segment of leads to priortize. This specifically helps me be able to better guide my team on where to spend their time
  • the UserGems workflows are efficient and can be automated, which is ideal for my team's efficiences
Read full review
ScreenShots