Diligent Entities (formerly Blueprint OneWorld) helps organizations centralize their corporate records securely, to ensure that teams are able to access, manage and report on entity information anytime, anywhere, and on any device.
N/A
TribeHR (discontinued)
Score6 out of 10
N/A
TribeHR was acquired by Netsuite in 2013. It has since been discontinued.
N/A
Pricing
Diligent Entities
TribeHR (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Diligent Entities
TribeHR (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Diligent Entities
TribeHR (discontinued)
Org Charts Software
Comparison of Org Charts Software features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
5.5
1 Ratings
0% above category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Cloud Storage Integration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple Device Syncing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rich Text Formatting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Note Organization
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration Features
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Note Search
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
To-Do Lists and Reminders
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Offline Access
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Clipper
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security and Encryption
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.6
2 Ratings
22% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.7
2 Ratings
20% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.3
2 Ratings
12% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
1 Ratings
5% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.8
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
Feature
Diligent Entities
-
Ratings
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.3
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Diligent Entities and TribeHR (discontinued)
I would recommend Diligent Entities for organisations with 20 or more entities as a valuable asset for ensuring secure and streamlined entity management. I would probably not recommend the product for companies with only a few entities, as the solution is quite expensive and it is geared towards larger, structured organisations, particularly those with international companies.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it's great for small companies to manage their basic HR functions if they do not have a dedicated department. I'm unsure of the capabilities it holds for a large company with multiple teams to organize and how the calendaring functions across departments. But, for our team of roughly 20 folks it is simple and straightforward.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would like even more capabilities, but I think that has to do with how we are using the site.
I would like to receive email notifications once a week with a summary of activity in TribeHR, including time-off scheduled by my team and any new documents or information that has been added.
I'd like reminders if I am going to go over my time off that is allotted to carry over into the new year and other pertinent vacation, floating holiday, sick time notifications.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Whilst most of the features in Diligent are of a high standard, there are some functions that could be made more user-friendly, to enable greater use of the product by more senior managers who may not have the time, coding, or other technical skills required to work out some of the functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Whilst Ontra and Kuberno are both excellent products, the cost of each was prohibitive when compared with Diligent Entities, and neither product integrated with the Australian Securities Investment Commission company portal for lodgement purposes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We evaluated Greenhouse but went with net suite because we were already using some of the other NetSuite. Greenhouse seemed a bit easier to use. The others were a bit too small, didn't have the stretch to scale.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As I stated it has alleviated numerous back and forth emails with our CFO (who is only available PT) and CEO (who is often too busy to spend time on HR functions) - this has allowed for easy answers to basic HR questions.
It has allowed us to track all employee time-off in one place, saving us time from checking each individual Outlook calendar for scheduling purposes.
It has allowed us to direct all employees to one place for core HR documents and information, ensuring that folks are always getting the same answers to their inquiries.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info